As did the BC Liberals, members
of the current NDP/Green coalition do not appear to take seriously
the threat to the health of all all living beings posed by the use
of wireless devices in the world today. To continue to ignore the
reproducible research conclusions of scientists most knowledgeable
of the dangers and health effects of wireless technology is
inexcusible, no matter how much the misinformed continue believing
Health Canada's Safety Code 6 keeps them "safe".
I invite you and your colleagues
to also perform the "10 minute cellphone test" as described in the
third paragraph of my email to Dr. Bonnie Henry (below). Perhaps
if all politicians did this, some real legislative action would be
taken to remove WiFi in schools and "smart" meters from the
electrical grid. Without such action the burden of decreasing
health of citizenry exposed to wireless radiation will become more
evident, and the politicians responsible for ignoring the many
warnings (from the best scientists studying wireless dangers) will
perhaps finally realize how wrong they were in not taking the
valid health concerns of EHS affected and other citizens more
seriously.
Sincerely,
XX| Subject: | WiFi safety in schools -- your email to Janis Hoffman (4 Jan 2019 15:18:34) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 9 Jan 2019 08:46:01 -0800 |
| From: | |
| To: | Bonnie Henry, PHO <bonnie.henry@gov.bc.ca> |
| CC: | Janis Hoffmann <parentsforsafeschools@gmail. |
Dear Dr. Henry,
As you should know, true science is based on facts, not consensus. While you, your predecessor and other political bureaucrats continue to express ignorance concerning the latest research on the DNA damaging effects of non-ionizing radiation on biological systems, none of you even seem to recognize the fact that the dangers to human health of such radiation have been documented for more than 50 years. Bombarding children's bodies billions of times per second to pulsed microwaves while exposed to school WiFi is ridiculous considering the known science. Even more ridiculous has been the fascist implementation of "smart" meters in this and other countries. Replacing safe and reliable long lasting glass and metal analog ("Legacy" meters) with a combustible piece of plastic and wireless computer circuitry ("smart"??) is even more insane.
Just because Health Canada's Safety Code 6 provides guidelines to protect one from overheating, it does absolutely nothing to protect one from the cumulative damage to health caused by today's wireless devices emitting pulsed microwave radiation. Even though you state "Safety Code 6 is designed to protect all age groups including children on a continuous basis and considers cumulative exposure to electromagnetic fields", you must realize that the "weight of evidence" procedure used by Health Canada also ignored much of the peer reviewed science evidencing biological harm from non-thermal exposures. This is why a large number of researchers made known their objections and label Safety Code 6 as 30 years obsolete and providing no protection from biological damage, particularly with respect to young children and pregnant women. No one except the misinformed have ever stated wireless is "safe".
No insurer will provide cover for liability arising from exposure to electromagnetic radiation. Those in the wireless industry know of the dangers, and much like those in the tobacco industry once did, fund unethical researchers to produce studies with the results they want. Funding is reduced and even withdrawn for research producing results they do not want to see. Look up Dr. Henry Lai and the "war gaming" he and others have experienced. By continuing with "the more studies are needed" mantra the wireless industry continues reaping massive profit from the "blissfully ignorant" who seem satisfied using the latest "smart" device on their road to declining health and future misery.
I tried your link to BCCDC and it seems to be outdated. Your link to the statement from Dr. Kendall is even more useless (401 error) as the page no longer exists.
In my opinion, the last paragraph of your email is just more rubbish. To continue on with the "more research needed" and "scientific consensus" arguments is political, and has nothing to do with real science. I suspect persons such as yourself would be doing more to protect the health of citizens if you microscopically examined your blood cells before using a cellphone beside your head for 10 minutes and then took another blood sample and saw the change. Maybe then you will personally observe the reality that pulsed microwave radiation really does interact negatively with natural cell health, and with that new first hand knowledge (true science) take some real action to inform others rather than repeating how protective Safety Code 6 is for everyone. Please let me know what your "real science" test result is so I can compare it to "consensus science".
I find it absolutely appalling that so many people and organizations still stubbornly remain blind to the proven threats to human health from exposure to microwave radiation.
Sincerely,
XX
No comments:
Post a Comment