Wednesday, 5 December 2018

Jerry Flynn's response to Tim Singer, Health Canada

 Corruption and Greed are Harming and Literally Killing an Unsuspecting Public 
Part 1 & 2

From: Jerry Flynn <>
Date: Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 5:28 PM
Subject: RE: The Greatest Health Scandal of our time will be the use of Wi-Fi devices in schools!
To: Janis Hoffmann <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>
Cc: <>, <>, Davies, Don <>, <>, <>, <>, Lobb, Ben <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, Trudeau, Justin <>

Dear Ms. Hoffmann,
As a once-proud Canadian, it saddens me greatly to say that I must concur with everything you said in your letter. Tim Singer’s reply to your letter was predictably vacuous and insincere, as usual! It is both a national tragedy and a national disgrace that Canada’s so-called Health Minister seems to be so totally unaware of and/or completely unwilling to hear any criticism of Health Canada … or of its globally-reviled Safety Code 6! For reasons only she knows, Canada’s health minister conducts herself as if she is completely ignorant of Health Canada’s long history of corruption and greed - which other countries of the world have long known.
If Prime Minister Trudeau only realized that his own three beautiful children, like Health Minister Petitpas Taylor’s eight siblings, are also likely to be hapless victims of this same corruption - if one of them hasn’t been already. Honest scientists the world over know that the $25-million, ten year NTP Study followed by the renowned Ramazzini Institute study both proved, conclusively, that non-thermal RF EMR CAUSES cancers. Informed people around the world are disgusted and angry that the WHO has allowed itself to be ‘captured’ by the industry-driven ICNIRP, which explains why neither agency will publicly acknowledge these two, acclaimed world-class studies.  Such is the corruption today. Such is the grip that the U.S. Military-Industrial-Complex has on the so-called International Health Regulatory Agencies of the world!
What the world is witnessing today is reminiscent of the closing chapter(s) of those dark, ugly days when tobacco, asbestos, Thalidomide, etc. were, in their day, the scourge of the earth. Only non-thermal EMF / EMR – both low (powerline 60 Hz) frequency and radio frequency is far, far worse, for it affects ALL living things, not just people!
No person and no living thing can escape non-thermal EMFs / EMR!

J.G. Flynn, Captain (retired), author of the book “Hidden Dangers” 
Bowser, B.C., Canada 

 From: Lorene Benoit <>
Date: Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 9:30 AM
Subject: wifi in Schools
To: <>
Cc: Janis Hoffmann <>, <>, Cc: <>, <>, Don <>, <>, <>, <>, Ben <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, Justin <>

We are concerned grandparents, who have read your letter dated Nov. 29th responding to the wifi dangers clearly outlined by Parents for Safe Schools. 
We find that your response indicates you are NOT really seeking the truth, which IS  your responsibility. Your closing statement: 
"If new scientific evidence were to demonstrate that exposure to RF energy below levels found in Safety Code 6 is a concern, the Department would take appropriate action to help protect the health and safety of Canadians." 
clearly indicates that you are NOT reading the scientific evidence that has been repeatedly presented to you that it is already a danger!

We concur that although you have responded to Ms. Hoffman's letter, likely with a similar response to all concerned citizens' letters, you are clearly ignoring existing valid evidence and refusing any action to protect children. 
This means you are responsible for aiding and abetting one of the greatest health scandals of our century. 

Benoit & Associates Health Education
Lorene Benoit, MHH, BEd, CHC, CRA,          NSP # 1143615-CA 
FBenoit BScNursing, NHC, LChabot HCA      NSP # 1143667-CA 

The Greatest Health Scandal of our time will be the use of Wi-Fi devices in schools!

From: Janis Hoffmann <>
Date: Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 1:29 PM
Subject: The Greatest Health Scandal of our time will be the use of Wi-Fi devices in schools!
To: <>, <>
Cc: <>, <>, Davies, Don <>, <>, <>, <>, Lobb, Ben <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, Trudeau, Justin <>

Dear Mr. Tim Singer,
The Honourable Ginette Petitpas Taylor, Minister of Health, has been unable to provide parents with ONE peer reviewed study stating the safety of Wi-Fi safety in our schools and has instead relied on Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 exposure “guidelines.” 

But on February 20, 2013, James McNamee, scientist for Health Canada, admitted in the Superior Court of Quebec, that the Safety Code 6 guideline for microwave radiation emitting from wireless technology is based ONLY on thermal effects, heating of the skin. This means Canada does not have any regulations in place to protect the public from long-term exposure to the biological effects of the “non-thermal” levels of microwave radiation. radiation-is-based-only-on-thermal-effects/

Your statement suggesting Health Canada scientists continually monitor the scientific research on human health effects of RF energy is misleading the public.

There are over 26,000 peer reviewed scientific studies on the health effects of electromagnetic radiation and yet Health Canada’s summary of studies consist of 19 studies ranging from 1983 before the World Health Organization declare RF as a 2B carcinogen in 2011, to 2012, then jumping to 2016. 

Health Canada has announced their support for a 2016 study by James McNamee, et al., done in 2012, where mice were exposed for 4 hours over 5 days and concluded no evidence of harm, claiming it was the most comprehensive study of its type ever done.

This seems like a blatant attempt to maintain that their research supersedes that of the National Toxicology Program and Ramazzini studies, and holds more credibility with Health Canada.  How does this even compare to a child attending school where mandatory exposure is 6 hours, 5 days a week, for a full year? No one has any idea what the levels of microwave radiation per classroom is when 25 children are downloading on cell phones, laptops and other wireless devices under industrial strength Wi-Fi transmitters.  And let us not forget to include the wireless audio systems operating on another frequency and wireless white boards with overhead projectors that have been installed in every classroom.

You have failed to mention the 10-year Ramaazzini Study that supported the findings of the US NTP study. Ronald Melnick PhD, formerly the Senior NIH toxicologist who led the design of the NTP study on cell phone radiation now a Senior Science Advisor to Environmental Health Trust (EHT) stated, "All of the exposures used in the Ramazzini study were below the US FCC limits. These are permissible exposures according the FCC.  In other words, a person can legally be exposed to this level of radiation. Yet cancers occurred in these animals at these legally permitted levels. The Ramazzini findings are consistent with the NTP study demonstrating these effects are a reproducible finding."

The US National Toxicology Program Expert Panel concluded that there is “Clear Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity” and the association of cancer in the heart and brain and cell phone radiation.  This is serious health and safety matter that will cause permanent damage to thousands of children in all our public schools. Currently it is mandatory that all children will be exposed RF Microwave Radiation  with no way to shield themselves from this full body radiation, much like the rats used in these studies.

A Canadian cancer specialist who testified before the Parliamentary Committee says Philpott’s failure to acknowledge the Committee’s findings is dangerous.  “We are already seeing increases in Glioblastoma, the most aggressive form of brain cancer,” said Dr. Anthony Miller, a cancer epidemiologist with the University of Toronto, who has been an advisor to the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
“This type brain cancer has been directly connected to cell phone use,” he said, referring to the findings of a $25 million US government study released in June.

It is disgraceful that this vital information, which provides justification for implementation of some guidelines and the Precautionary Principle, is hidden from the public.  When did our government decide that the profits from the wireless industry superseded the health and well being of our next generation? 

Governments have allowed this technology to pervade our lives saying it did not have proof it could harm us. We now have evidence from the latest Canadian Interphone study data that found a statistically significant doubling of risk for glioma among cell phone users with only 558 lifetime hours of use.  How long will it take a teenager to amass 558 hours of cell phone use? - Dr. Devra Davis, President and founder of Environmental Health Trust

By refusing to implement the Precautionary Principal and ignoring the growing body of “clear evidence” of cancer, the mandatory exposure in our schools may ultimately be responsible for the greatest health scandal of our time.


Janis Hoffmann
Victoria BC V9B 6J3

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Singer, Tim (HC/SC) <>
Date: Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 5:46 AM
Subject: Re: the use of Wi-Fi devices in schools
To: <>

Dear Ms. Hoffman,

Thank you for your recent email of October 29, 2018, addressed to the Honourable Ginette Petitpas Taylor, Minister of Health, concerning the use of Wi-Fi devices in schools. The Minister’s office has asked me to provide a detailed response on her behalf.

As mentioned in earlier correspondence, Health Canada develops radiofrequency (RF) exposure guidelines, commonly referred to as Safety Code 6, which is applied by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada in their regulatory standards for radiofrequency devices. Safety Code 6 takes into account all peer-reviewed scientific studies, including recent studies carried out worldwide, and employs a weight-of-evidence approach when evaluating possible health risks from exposure to RF energy.

The exposure limits in Safety Code 6 are set well below the lowest exposure level (threshold) at which any scientifically-established, adverse health effects occur and take into account the total exposure from all sources of RF energy. Health Canada scientists have concluded, on the basis of current scientific data, that the recommended human exposure levels in Safety Code 6 continue to be protective of the health of Canadians. 

Health Canada scientists continually monitor the scientific research on human health effects of RF energy. Please be assured that the Department is aware of the work of the United States National Toxicology (NTP) program. We have reviewed the final reports of the Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation studies conducted by NTP which were released on November 1, 2018. In these studies, NTP researchers looked at the effects of exposing rats and mice to extremely high levels of radiofrequency radiation throughout their entire body and lasting for most of their lifetime. The exposure levels in these studies ranged from 1.5 to 10 watts per kilogram of body weight.  These levels are 18 to 125 times higher than the whole body human exposure limit recommended in Safety Code 6. Such exposures are not representative of human exposures from cell phone use.

As advised in previous communications, decisions regarding the implementation of Wi-Fi in schools (provincially regulated) do not fall within Health Canada’s mandate. Consequently, we continue to encourage you to engage your local school board and provincial authority with respect to these concerns.

Health Canada scientists will continue to review the scientific literature related to possible health effects of RF exposures.  If new scientific evidence were to demonstrate that exposure to RF energy below levels found in Safety Code 6 is a concern, the Department would take appropriate action to help protect the health and safety of Canadians.

Again, thank you for writing and I hope that my comments are helpful.

Tim Singer

Director General, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate
Health Canada / Government of Canada
Directeur général, Direction des sciences de la santé environnementale et de la radioprotection
Santé Canada / Gouvernement du Canada /

How safe are our children in school where microwave radiation exposure is mandatory?

Brain Cancer #1 for Children 15-19 yrs While FDA Minimizes Risk From Conclusive NIH Study
The FDA does not do post market safety surveying to see how heavy users are developing more cancer and neurological disorders like they do with drugs and medical devices. We are seeing a dramatic increase in brain tumors in the three areas of the brain that get the most radiation from cell phones: frontal lobe, temporal lobe, and cerebellum. The Italian Supreme court has already ruled that cell phones can cause brain cancer.

MUST WATCH - Veteran MD Drops Bombshell At 5G Hearing
Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an internal medicine physician & professor gives her testimony regarding the dangers of electromagnetic radiation. She says: “Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period."

MUST WATCH - Senator Patrick Colbeck, R-Canton, warns about the dangers some new technologies pose

Thyroid Cancer & Mobile Phone Use
Men who used cell phones for more than 15 years had over twice the risk of thyroid cancer as compared to non-cell phone users after controlling for other factors. Women who used cell phones for more than two hours per day had a 52% greater risk of thyroid cancer as compared to non-cell phone users.


Technology and Education – How safe are our children?
A large number of studies in animals have reported impaired learning and memory following radiofrequency exposures, including from Wi-Fi. Exposures have increased anxiety-like behaviours, decreased learning and increased neurodegeneration in the hippocampus and cerebral cortex of the brain, regions important for cognition (Zhang et al 2017;Saikhedkar et al 2014). There are hyperactivity behaviours and demyelination of neurones (which is a loss of the cells which surround neurones to increase their speed of communication; Kim et al 2017).

There's a clear cell phone-cancer link, but FDA is downplaying it
Also, health concerns for children may be greater than that for adults due to increased penetration of cell phone radiation within the brains of children. Simply ignoring the cancer data from the NTP studies is not in the interest of public health. Because of the widespread use of cell phones among the general public, even a small increase in cancer risk would have a serious public health impact.


An Emergency Appeal to the World’s Governments by Scientists, Doctors and Environmental Organizations
RF radiation has both immediate and long-term effects. Cancer and heart disease are examples of long-term effects. Alteration of heart rhythm[100] and changes in brain function (EEG)[101] are examples of immediate effects. A syndrome that was called radiowave sickness[102] in the former Soviet Union and is called electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) around the world today[103] can be either acute or chronic. Professor Dr. Karl Hecht has published a detailed history of these syndromes, compiled from a review of more than 1,500 Russian scientific papers and the clinical histories of more than 1,000 of his own patients in Germany. Objective findings include sleep disorders, abnormal blood pressure and heart rate, digestive disorders, hair loss, tinnitus and skin rash. Subjective symptoms include dizziness, nausea, headache, memory loss, inability to concentrate, fatigue, flu-like symptoms and cardiac pain. [104]