Tuesday, 5 February 2019

Clear Evidence of Cancer!

Dear Mr. Jepsen,
As a trustee that cares about the health and well being of the students in your district I hope you will be overwhelmed with the amount of  peer reviewed studies from scientists and medical experts showing "clear evidence" of cancer. 

Martin Pall PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University, is only one of many highly regarded scientists that is pleading with Government Officials to protect our children from the mandatory exposure to microwave radiation.  This paper is an excellent summary of many peer-reviewed studies showing the health effects from this exposure.  https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935118300355

EMF Portal - Over 27,000 peer-reviewed studies by scientists and medical experts 
On March 26-29, 2018, the National Toxicology Program (NTP), a 10-year study costing the US 25 million dollars, had eleven experts review the reports from the NTP's cell phone radiation studies. They concluded that exposure to cell phone radiation caused a rare cancer, malignant schwannoma in the heart, and incidences of glioma, a rare, aggressive and highly malignant brain cancer.
Conclusions were based on NTP’s scale of “clear evidence”, “some evidence”, “equivocal evidence”, and “no evidence”. Clear Evidence being conclusive.

The Ramazzini Institute also completed the world's largest animal study on cell tower radiation and confirmed the findings of the National Toxicology Program link to Cancer

Wifi and EMF Studies showing harm (29 pages)

In January 1998, The Wingspread Conference held a three-day academic conference where the Precautionary Principle was defined. It was agreed the Precautionary Principle would be implemented when an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. The Precautionary Principle shifts the burden of proof, insisting that those responsible for an activity must vouch for its harmlessness and be held responsible if damage occurs. 
Why are our government officials ignoring the scientific facts and refusing to implement the Precautionary Principle to protect our children when there is an overwhelming amount of evidence proving harm?

Janis Hoffmann
Parents for Safe School 
Sent from a hard wired computer

No comments:

Post a Comment