Dear
Mr. Jepsen,
As
a trustee that cares about the health and well being of the students in
your district I hope you will be overwhelmed with the amount of peer
reviewed studies from scientists and medical experts showing "clear
evidence" of cancer.
Martin
Pall PhD, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences,
Washington State University, is only one of many highly regarded scientists
that is pleading with Government Officials to protect our children from the
mandatory exposure to microwave radiation.
This paper is an excellent summary of many peer-reviewed studies showing
the health effects from this exposure. https://www.sciencedirect.com/ science/article/pii/ S0013935118300355
EMF Portal - Over 27,000 peer-reviewed studies by scientists and medical
experts
On March 26-29, 2018, the
National Toxicology Program (NTP), a 10-year study costing the US 25 million
dollars, had eleven experts review the reports from the NTP's cell phone
radiation studies. They concluded that exposure to cell phone radiation caused
a rare cancer, malignant schwannoma in the heart, and incidences of glioma, a
rare, aggressive and highly malignant brain cancer.
Conclusions
were based on NTP’s
scale of “clear evidence”, “some evidence”, “equivocal evidence”, and “no
evidence”. Clear Evidence being conclusive.
The
Ramazzini Institute also completed the world's largest animal study on cell
tower radiation and confirmed the findings of the National Toxicology Program
link to Cancer
Wifi and EMF Studies showing harm (29
pages)
In January 1998, The
Wingspread Conference held a three-day academic conference where the
Precautionary Principle was defined. It was agreed the Precautionary
Principle would be implemented when an activity raises threats of harm to human
health or the environment, even if some cause and effect relationships are not
fully established scientifically. The Precautionary Principle shifts the
burden of proof, insisting that those responsible for an activity must vouch for
its harmlessness and be held responsible if damage occurs.
Why are our government
officials ignoring the scientific facts and refusing to implement the
Precautionary Principle to protect our children when there is an overwhelming amount of evidence proving harm?
Janis Hoffmann
Sent from a hard wired computer
No comments:
Post a Comment