Letter to BC's Chief Medical Health Officer about authorizing Microwave Radiation exposure on the public

From: Jerry Flynn [mailto:jerryjgf@shaw.ca]
Sent: January 28, 2015 1:27 PM
To: perry.kendall@gov.bc.ca; premier@gov.bc.ca; suzanne.anton.mla@leg.bc.ca
Cc: hlth.minister@gov.bc.ca; hlth.dmoffice@gov.bc.ca; adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca; scott.fraser.mla@leg.bc.ca; gordon.hogg.mla@leg.bc.ca; john.horgan.mla@leg.bc.ca; carole.james.mla@leg.bc.ca; moira.stilwell.mla@leg.bc.ca; andrew.weaver.mla@leg.bc.ca; john.yap.mla@leg.bc.ca
Subject: British Columbians Are Not Being Protected Against Non-Thermal Radiation!

January 28, 2015

Dear Dr. Kendall,

British Columbians Are Not Being Protected Against Non-Thermal Radiation The Biggest Single Threat To Human Health - Ever!

As British Columbia's Provincial Health Officer your mandate is to protect the health and well-being of all British Columbians, yet in the more than 15 years you've held that office, you have consistently failed to protect any of us - or yourself and your own family - from the known, documented dangers to humans, flora and fauna of non-thermal radiation! Even more harmful to all living things is the low-level 'pulsed' non-thermal radiation, which all of today's wireless devices emit - especially Smart Meters, but even baby monitors! These dangers have been known to honest scientists and militaries of the world for well more than 50 years, Dr. Kendall!  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]

Dr. Kendall, it has long been known that Health Canada's Radiation Protection Bureau and their like-minded colleagues in Industry Canada are comfortably bedded down with the corrupt U.S. Military / Government / Industrial Complex, which U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned the American people to be on guard against in 1961. [13]  Ten years later, in 1971, then President Nixon's own Electromagnetic Advisory Panel advised him that: "power levels in and around American cities, airports ... and homes may already be biologically significant. The population at risk may well be the entire population. The consequences of undervaluing or misjudging the biological effects of long-term, low-level exposure could become a critical problem for the public health, especially if genetic effects are involved." [14] Dr. Kendall, this was almost 20 years before wireless devices as we know them today appeared in North America!

Given the above, should the Government of BC still elect to retain you as the PHO, surely now you would immediately urge the Minister of Health to establish B.C.'s own radiation protection policy that reflects much lower, much safer radiation Exposure Limits in order to protect the people, flora and fauna of our beautiful province? Any sane, civilized, democratic provincial radiation policy should always err on the side of caution and reflect the Precautionary Principle.

Dr. Kendall, it is imperative that each and every person in receipt of this email fully and clearly understands your views and stance on key aspects of radiation. Please clarify for them (and me) which of the following eleven (11) statements you, as PHO, concur with or reject because you believe it/them to be incorrect. Your disagreements should be supported with references to credible peer-reviewed studies done by 'honest' scientists - i.e., those not funded by industry or the U.S. Military. This qualification will exclude studies done by many of ICNIRP's, WHO's, ICES' and Health Canada's senior scientists who can be shown to have long ties to industry and/or the U.S. Military.

1.    All of today's wireless devices, e.g., Smart Meters, baby monitors, cell phones, cell phone towers, cordless phones, tablet and laptop computers, TV games, GPS systems, Wi-Fi routers, Wi-Fi installations in coffee shops, cars, buses, trains, planes, ships, parks, etc. emit low-level, pulsed, non-thermal radio frequency radiation or EMR (electro-magnetic radiation) which scientists and militaries the world over know is harmful to people, flora and fauna. [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]

2.    EMR ('radiation') from all devices (emitters) is cumulative. Scientists have coined the term "electro-smog" which is the resultant, aggregate 'cloud' of invisible radiation emitted by all of today's wireless devices, to which humans, flora and fauna are continuously exposed 24/7/365!

3.    There is no such thing as a SAFE level of EMR ('radiation')! All man-made frequencies are harmful to humans, flora and fauna - irrespective of power density or signal strength! Scientists and militaries know that certain frequencies are considerably more harmful to the human brain, the central nervous system and immune systems at power densities (signal strengths) that are tens-of-thousands of times weaker than Safety Code 6 Limits! [20] [21] [22] [23]

4.    Health Canada's "Safety Code 6" does not even recognize, let alone provide any protection against, non-thermal EMR ('radiation'). Health Canada's own Dr. James McNamee admitted in a Quebec Superior Court in February 2013 that Safety Code 6 applies only to thermal radiation (that which heats the skin)!  His admission means that no person, flora or fauna in Canada is now - or has ever been - protected against the 'non-thermal' radiation emitted by all of today's wireless devices! [24]

5.    Safety Code 6 originally was intended to apply only to federal employees, and then for just six minutes' exposure to thermal EMR ('radiation')! Yet, somehow, over the years, Health Canada has allowed that brief 6 minutes duration to undergo a complete metamorphosis such that today Health Canada - and the wireless and electric utility industries - would have the public believe that Safety Code 6 protects them from continuous exposure to radiation 24/7/365 - in perpetuity! Health Canada through its Safety Code 6 deliberately and consciously ignores today's real-life situation, whereby the entire population is exposed continuously 24/7/365 to an ever-thickening cloud of low-level, pulsed non-thermal toxic EMR ('radiation') from an endless and ever-growing array of wireless devices! [25] [26]

6.    Health Canada's Radiation Protection Bureau (and their counterparts in Industry Canada) are and have been for years in bed with the corrupt international radiation protection cartel (see below), which comprises: 1) WHO (World Health Organization), 2) ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection), 3) ICES (International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety) and 4) FCC (Federal Communications Commission) - none of whom will admit that non-thermal EMR ('radiation') can produce harmful biological effects in humans, flora and fauna. All five agencies are puppets of the ICES, the czars of which are the U.S. Department of Defense - see 7. Below). Consequently, Health Canada's Safety Code 6 reflects radiation Exposure Limits which are virtually identical to the those of the cartel members! [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33]

7.    Health Canada's own Dr. Art Thansandote is, and has been for many years, Co-Chairman of the omnipotent Sub-Committee 4 within ICES, which establishes the 'safe' radiation Exposure Limits for the USA (but which are promulgated to the world by the FCC). The principal members of ICES are: U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army, Motorola, Nokia, Siemens, Alcatel-Lucent and Bell. [34]  Health Canada's Dr. James McNamee and others from Health Canada and Industry Canada are members as well, as are three members of the "product defense" firm: Exponent Inc. Next to the USA, Canada has the largest contingent of ICES members of any country: 8 members! Safety Code 6's radiation Exposure Limits are virtually identical to those which Dr. Thansandote helps establish for the USA (via ICES/FCC)!

8.    Dr. Michael Repacholi, together with Dr. Maria Stuchly, both then with Health & Welfare Canada, established Safety Code 6 "safety" radiation Exposure Limits for Canada (1979). In 2002, Dr. Repacholi founded ICNIRP and became its inaugural Chairman and established ICNIRP's radiation Exposure Limits. Next he moved to the WHO where, as Co-Ordinator of the 10-year, $250-million International Study on EMFs (electro-magnetic fields), he was THE key person who established WHO's radiation Exposure Limits (2006).  Now Chairman Emeritus of ICNIRP, Dr. Repacholi is a consultant for industry and continues to have close ties to and within IEEE/ICES. Once again, it should surprise no one that Safety Code 6's radiation Exposure Limits are virtually identical to those of the WHO, ICNIRP, ICES and FCC - which are amongst the highest/most dangerous in the world!

9.    Health Canada will not admit that electro-magnetic fields (EMFs), which are present with all electricity, i.e., household wiring, household appliances, tools, machinery, high voltage transmission and distribution lines, power transformers, power sub-stations etc. are harmful to humans, flora and fauna. Scientists have known for years that EMFs cause leukemia, many other cancers and a host of other diseases in humans! Health Canada's posture reflects the degree to which the North American electric power industry was able to corrupt Dr. Michael Repacholi and the WHO's task force on EMFs! [35] [36] [37] [38]

10.    Health Canada and Industry Canada both have senior officials who regularly attend CWTA's (the Canadian Wireless and Telecommunications Association)'s Health Advisory Committee! The President and CEO of CWTA is fluently bilingual Bernard Lord, QC, ONB, former two-time Premier of New Brunswick and reputedly an aspiring successor to Prime Minister Harper when the latter eventually leaves office. Mr. Lord aggressively lobbies  - with astonishing success - all levels of government and private sector corporations across Canada promoting the widespread use of all of today's wireless products. Mr. Lord is also Chairman of Ontario Power Generation! [42] [43] A very powerful and influential man is he!

11.    Health Canada (like ICNIRP, ICES and FCC) will not admit that there is such a thing as Electro-Hypersensitivity or EHS. First identified in 1934, today it is recognized by the WHO and many countries of the world. EHS is a debilitating impairment which people suffer who cannot tolerate any exposure to non-thermal EMR and EMFs. Some suffer from even the weakest levels of non-thermal radiation.  An estimated 4-10% of world's population now suffer from EHS, which some have predicted will increase to 50% by just 2017!   [39] [40] [41]

In conclusion, Dr. Kendall, it should be clear to you now (and all addressees) that the evidence is compelling, overwhelming and absolutely incontrovertible that any radio frequency radiation - no matter how weak - is harmful to all living things, but none more so than the long-term, low-level, pulsed, non-thermal radiation emitted by today's ever-expanding constellation of wireless devices!  Were it not for the systemic corruption throughout Western industrialized countries, which sadly includes Health Canada and Industry Canada, today's "looming health crisis of our time" would be nothing more than a person's worst nightmare! Nor would wireless baby monitors and Smart Meters etc. ever be allowed in this - or any - country! On behalf of all British Columbians, Dr. Kendall, respect your Hippocratic Oath and start protecting British Columbians, flora and fauna against today's insidious and pernicious non-thermal radiation!

Sincerely,

James G. ("Jerry") Flynn, Captain (Retired)

References
[1] http://smartmeterdangers.org/smart-meter-position-statements/smart-meters-correcting-gross-misinformation/
[2] http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Electromagnetic_Hypersensitivity.pdf
[3] http://www.chronicexposure.org/occupational.html   
[4] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xehJzyttZr8
[5] http://sjlendman.blogspot.ca/2011/01/electromagnetic-frequency-mind-control.html
[6] http://electroplague.com/2014/09/06/report-usaf-rfmicrowave-radiation-biological-effects-1994/
[7] The Microwave Debate, Nicholas H. Steneck, pp 117  - http://www.buffalolib.org/vufind/Record/349608/Reviews  
[8] The Microwave Debate, Nicholas H. Steneck, pp125, 125
[9] http://www.magdahavas.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Glaser_1972_shortened.pdf        
[10] "The Zapping of America" Paul Brodeur (1977) - http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20070085,00.html   
[11] The Microwave Debate, Nicholas H. Steneck, pp 195     
[12] http://www.icems.eu/docs/Robert_C_Kane.pdf      
[13] http://www.ices-emfsafety.org/documents/publications/ICES_Annual_Report_2011-12.pdf
[14] The Zapping of America, Paul Brodeur (1977)  pp. 228
[15] http://www.planningsanity.co.uk/reports/cost281.htm
[16] https://electroplague.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/rf-microwave-radiation-biological-effects-rome-labs.pdf 
[17] http://www.magdahavas.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Glaser_1972_shortened.pdf        
[18] http://www.magdahavas.com/category/electrosmog-exposure/
[19] www.bioinitiative.org <http://www.bioinitiative.org>
[20] http://www.stayonthetruth.com/neil-cherry.php
[21] http://assassinationscience.com/EMP5.htm
[22] https://smartmeternewsupdates.wordpress.com/page/5/
[23] www.wirelesswatchblog.org/wp-content/uploads/2001/11/20...    
[24] http://www.magdahavas.com/health-canada-admits-safety-code-6-guideline-for-microwave-radiation-is-based-only-on-thermal-effects/ 
[25] http://www.emf-risks.com/2013/09/1973-report-researching-effects-of.html  
[26] http://www.emfanalysis.com/research/
[27] http://emrstop.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=71&Itemid=35
[28] https://www.bems.org/node/873
[29] http://www.bioinitiative.org/report/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/sec04_2012_Evidence_for_Inadequacy_of_the_Standards.pdf
[30] file:///C:\Users\Jerry\Downloads\Chapter_4_FINAL_doc%20(2).p
[31] http://lifeenergies.com/he-emr/
[32] http://www.buergerwelle.de/assets/files/cellularantenna_neil_cherryj3.htm?cultur
[33] ICES (SCC-39) Annual Report: 2011 - 2012
[34] http://www.ices-emfsafety.org/documents/publications/ICES_Annual_Report_2011-12.pdf
[35] http://www.zakairan.com/Teslas/EMR&EMF.htm#.UeYLbdKv7To     
[36] http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/scalar_tech/esp_scalartech_cellphonesmicrowave17.htm
[37] http://bizgenerationnetwork.blogspot.ca/2012/07/lynas-cancer-and-you.html
[38] http://microwavenews.com/docs/WHOWatch.pdf        
[39] The Microwave Debate, Nicholas H. Steneck, pp 81 
[40] http://microwavenews.com/         
[41] http://c4st.org/images/documents/scientific_studies/ElectrohypersensitivityStateoftheArtofaFuncationalImpairmentJohansson.pdf
[42] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Lord
[43] http://www.opg.com/about/management/board-of-directors/Pages/board-of-directors.aspx