Press
Conference - C4ST Reaction to Royal Society Committee – Safety Code6 Review
(4/01/14)
Since May 2013, C4ST has
expressed concerns about the existing members’ financial relationships with
companies, industry associations and lobby groups which are directly affected
by the outcome of this panel review. In addition, four of the
eight Expert Panel members have published material and statements demonstrating
predetermined viewpoints that they don’t believe published evidence showing
that humans are in danger well below the existing safety threshold published in
Safety Code 6.
Teachers'
Unions in Germany, UK, USA and Canada Who Have Done Their Research Do Not
Support WiFi in Schools
What kind of liabilities are school boards prepared to bear, for knowingly putting children under unnecessary and involuntary exposure to an IARC Class 2B Possible Carcinogen?
What kind of liabilities are school boards prepared to bear, for knowingly putting children under unnecessary and involuntary exposure to an IARC Class 2B Possible Carcinogen?
‘Kick
out politicians who give students hazardous e-readers with unproven educational
value’”
Today it is very difficult to be a teacher and take
responsibility for teaching in the classroom where students’ cell phones are
constantly ringing, text messages are being
sent back and forth, and surfing the entire time online or playing games through iPhones and iPads. All this when students really should be working on their school assignments.
sent back and forth, and surfing the entire time online or playing games through iPhones and iPads. All this when students really should be working on their school assignments.
A lawyer has been retained to investigate the possibility of a Class Action law suit with respect to Electro sensitivity
The Lakeshore Coalition have been working with an
environmental law firm towards development of a Class Action Law Suit on behalf
of persons who suffer Electro-sensitivity and Electro-hypersensitivity.
No comments:
Post a Comment