We want to know is Cancer an acceptable risk too

-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:	Parents, teachers and students want to know is Cancer an acceptable risk too?
Date:	Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:02:52 -0700
From:	Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
To:	hlth.dmoffice@gov.bc.ca

Dear Deputy Minister Stephen Brown,

We would like to remind you that we still haven't received a response to our letter dated Jan. 25 2019.  We would like to book an appointment to discuss our concerns.

Respectfully,

Janis Hoffmann

250-478-7976

-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:	Parents, teachers and students want to know is Cancer an acceptable risk too?
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:37:32 -0800
From:	Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
To:	hlth.dmoffice@gov.bc.ca

Dear Deputy Minister Stephen Brown,

We would like an investigation as to:

-       Why the Ministry of Health, Adrian Dix and the Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry has put our correspondence on a FYI list of  “frequent writers” giving them option NOT to respond to any of our emails? See FOI attached 

-       Why they listed one of the subject matters as Monsanto?

-       Why our Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry, has refused to provide us with an official response to the 2018, current findings of the US National Toxicology Program and the supporting Ramazzini Institute Study who concluded there is “Clear Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity” and the association of cancer in the heart and brain and cell phone radiation?

-       Why they have ignored more than 27,000 studies that confirm that exposure to RF/EMF is associated with many health effects, including cancers and other serious debilitating effects, like autism, Alzheimer’s, hormone problems, DNA damage, fertility, etc.?   

-       Why Dr. Bonnie Henry relies on Dr. Kosatsky who appears to have no educational background in the biological effects from RF radiation to advise her on the safety of Wi-Fi in our schools. Dr. Kosatsky stated, “ while I am not a cancer epidemiologist, nor a specialist in the health effects of non-ionizing radiation”?

-       Why they rely on the advise of the BC Cancer Agency when this agency clearly have a vested interest in supporting the wireless industry in return for millions of dollars in donations?

-       Why we have not been provided us with a copy of these studies and the recent publications that they recently "reviewed" along with the names of the scientists and medical experts?

-       Why they keep quoting Safety Code 6 when we all know there are no regulations put in place for non-ionizing radiation?

-       Why Dr. Bonnie Henry states that “. . . and we continue to recommend people make personal choices to reduce their exposure.” How can parents make a Personal Choice to protect their children when microwave radiation exposure is mandatory in all our public schools?  

-       Why a known 2b carcinogen listed next to lead, DDT, methyl mercury, chloroform, and car exhaust is an acceptable risk in our schools?  

-        We want to know is Cancer an acceptable risk too?

Our Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry, and the Ministry of Health, Adrian Dix, has failed to do their due diligence and take immediate action to mitigate the risk by informing the School Boards throughout the province of the established health risks associated with long-term exposure to microwave radiation by recommending the use of hard-wired connections to access the Internet in our schools. For as little as a one time cost of $500 US dollars every classroom would be provided with 40 Ethernet ports plus adapters for their wireless devices, costing about $20 per child, a small price to pay compared to brain surgery, chemotherapy, radiation treatments etc. http://octowired.com/

We are hoping for a timely response.

Sincerely, 

Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools

250-478-7976