Scientists
Sue FCC
for Dismissing Studies Linking Cell Phone Radiation to Cancer
The
agency has dismissed hundreds of
scientific studies submitted to its inquiry on wireless
radiation and the
advice of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and others,
without providing any
rationale for doing so,” she said. The
lawsuit specifically accuses the FCC of violating the
Administrative Procedure
Act (APA) and is requesting an appeal of the agency’s prior
order denying to
revisit cellular phone standards.
CHD v the Federal Communication Commission (FCC)
Washington,
DC—Children’s
Health Defense (CHD) is leading a historic legal action
against the Federal
Communication Commission (FCC) for its refusal to review their
25 year old
guidelines, and to promulgate scientific, human evidence-based
radio frequency
emissions (“RF”) rules that adequately protect public health
from wireless
technology radiation. The Petition contends the
agency’s actions are
capricious and not evidence-based. The Petition was filed on
2/2/2020 in the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The
Petitioners include parents of children injured by wireless
devices, a mother
whose son died from a brain tumor from cell tower exposure,
physicians who see
the epidemic of sickness in their clinics and Professor David
Carpenter, a
renowned scientist.
https://
PRESS RELEASE:
The Court of Appeal of Turin confirmed in a full judgment
published on 13
January 2020 (904/2019 of 3.12.2019 , Romeo v. INAIL) the
decision of the
Tribunal of Ivrea of 2017. Judge Fadda considers that the
worker’s acoustic
neuroma (benign tumour of the head) was indeed caused by the
use of the mobile
phone
"“there
is protective scientific jurisprudence that supports the
assertion of causation
based on criteria of “more likely than not”. P.33.”...
“Epidemiological
data, the results of experiments on animals (not contradicted,
at present, by
other experiments of the same type), the duration and
intensity of exposure …
which are particularly important in view of the dose-response
relationship
established – at the scientific level – between exposure to
mobile phone
radiofrequencies and the risk of acoustic neuroma, as well as
the absence of
any other factor which could have caused the disease”....
“strong
evidence to assert a causal role between the complainant’s
occupational
exposure, his exposure to radiation from mobile phones and the
disease that
occurred”.
Apple Bid To End IPhone Safety Suit Prompts Discovery
Order
A California federal judge refused
Apple's motion to
dismiss a proposed class action claiming it fraudulently
marketed iPhones as
safe and exposed consumers to excessive radiofrequency
radiation, instead
converting the motion to a summary judgment bid and sending
the case to
discovery.
Phonegate Scandal: Environmental Health Trust and Phonegate Alert Call for Congressional Hearings on Illegal Phone Radiation
“The
FCC is failing in its regulatory duties to protect consumers and instead is
setting policy to protect the cell phone manufacturers whose phones exceed the
federal safety exposure guidelines by over 500% in some cases, simply when
tested as consumers are using them: directly against the body in shirt and
pants pockets and tucked into waistbands and bras,” stated Devra Davis PhD,
MPH, President of EHT and Dr. Marc Arazi, President of AP in their letter to
Senators Roger Wicker and Lamar Alexander, and Representatives Carolyn Maloney
and Frank Pallone.
No comments:
Post a Comment