Monday, 11 January 2021

Colon Cancer Rates In Younger Adults Are Rising

Archive of 4,000 Documents Reveals Government Knew Decades Ago About Health Impact of Wireless Technology

A few years ago, when Glaser realized the importance of his archives, he donated them to Dr. Magda Havas, Ph.D. of Trent University in Canada. Havas, an associate professor of environmental and resource studies, has worked for more than a decade to expose the harms of wireless technology.  Researcher Zorach Glaser, Ph.D. spent decades archiving studies that examine the link between certain health issues and exposure to microwave and radio frequencies. Scholars and the public are now invited to help review Glaser’s documents.

 

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/government-knew-harmful-impact-wireless-technology-human-health/?fbclid=IwAR2OklKO3Z0dJd-bt08Zz9GR7tPJesWFhWBG0VPWAhCodW4bd9SKxyFjCVk

 

Colon Cancer Rates In Younger Adults Are Rising

Get those cell phones out of your pockets

Those born around 1990 are twice as likely to get colon cancer and four times as likely to get rectal cancer than those born in 1950, according to the American Cancer Society (ACS). New cases of colon cancer and rectal cancer are occurring at an increasing rate among young and middle-aged adults throughout the U.S.  In 2020, there will be about 18,000 cases of colorectal cancer diagnosed in people under 50, or about 49 new cases per day, according to the Colon Cancer Coalition. It's reported that one in five colorectal cancer patients are between 20 and 54 years old.

 

https://www.henryford.com/blog/2020/08/colon-cancer-rates-younger-adults-rising?fbclid=IwAR3Sq_AXeaY5acARYcLxJlrdp2CIoOuBSu73TFMS7J5_5401wTYEoRGSrYQ

 

Radiation From Wireless Devices May Cause Breast Cancer, New Study Shows

A meta-analysis of eight studies reveals that exposure to radiation from cell phones, iPads and laptops significantly increase the risk of breast cancer, especially for women over 50.

 

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/radiation-wireless-devices-may-cause-breast-cancer/?fbclid=IwAR0ZSXkbQTefvtHEs2bC0X4NhJ-wthAmBHpSdjzjFe0R-Mvk5zkNbGmYrMQ

 

MICROWAVES AND CHILDREN

'Children absorb more MWR than adults because their brain tissues are more absorbent, their skulls are thinner and their relative size is smaller. MWR from wireless devices has been declared a possible human carcinogen. Children are at greater risk than adults when exposed to any carcinogen. Because the average latency time between first exposure and diagnosis of a tumor can be decades, tumors induced in children may not be diagnosed until well into adulthood. The fetus is particularly vulnerable to MWR. MWR exposure can result in degeneration of the protective myelin sheath that surrounds brain neurons. MWR-emitting toys are being sold for use by young infants and toddlers. Digital dementia has been reported in school age children. A case study has shown when cellphones are placed in teenage girls’ bras multiple primary breast cancer develop beneath where the phones are placed.'

 

https://www.sciencedirect.com/.../pii/S2213879X14000583

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PRISONS WITHOUT BARS

Did wireless radiation kill our son and our dog?

Leia had a tumor the size of a baseball in her head, which is visible in these photos taken just before she passed. She spent most of her time with Justis in his room while he played video games and streamed his favorite shows. Justis was only 4 when we got Leia and they were such close friends.

 

https://justisforall.org/2018/12/14/did-wireless-radiation-kill-our-son-and-our-dog/?fbclid=IwAR0mNBTXyUl4zeEc58zgA6pga4OChokWUmryLJuqSIo3Ri4-yU2mpWtbPKU

 


 

 

PRISONS WITHOUT BARS: JAYDEN'S STORY

Jayden Jancovic is a Montreal teenager handicapped by electromagnetic fields (EMFs) since the age of 5.  When the pressure in his head is too strong, Jayden has no solution other than to take refuge in a bath since the water protects him from EMFs.

Here is an excerpt from the 2019 movie on environmental hypersensitivities Prisons Without Bars by directors Giguère Nicole and Isabelle Hayeur:

 

https://youtu.be/lbtpBEvJzd4

 

Stories of Hope ~ a teen's foggy brain, rash, itch, fatigue, nausea

"I threw up most days. I felt like the life was being sucked out of me. It was like my body was exploding."  Starting in grade 8, Solveig's life became a nightmare.  "I was the most itchy you've ever been times 100. I would have to dig my nails into my skin to distract myself in class. By noon I had to call my mom in tears to pick me up from school."

 

https://www.jesssherman.com/blog/stories-of-hope-rash-foggy-brain-fatigue-nausea?fbclid=IwAR2dR3xD6oKIUlRNywVDMTm5MWjLFS5WS4lPaEdGsNk3r4A496II6_d6Eoo



Saturday, 9 January 2021

#1 Dear BC Minister of Education, will you protect our children from the health risks?

 From: Safetecinschools <citizens4safetec@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:46 AM
Subject: Will you protect our children from the health risks?
To: <jennifer.whiteside.MLA@leg.bc.ca>, <educ.minister@gov.bc.ca>

Dear BC Minister of Education, Jennifer Whiteside,

 

-        Did you know all wireless devices emit microwave radiation?

 

-        Did you know that it is now mandatory that every child attending school will be exposed all day to microwave radiation from wifi and all the other wireless devices?

 

-        Did you know our School Health Officer, Dr. Stanwick, has endorsed the installation of microwave radiation a known 2b carcinogen listed next to lead, DDT, methyl mercury, chloroform, and car exhaust as an acceptable risk in our schools?

 

-        Did you know School Districts have refused to educate students, parents and staff on how to avoid excessive RFR exposure when handling wireless devices during class time as outlined in the user manuals? 

 

-        Did you know the federally mandated safety manual that comes with all cell phones says to keep these devices up to an inch away from the body at all times?

 

-        Did you know children attending school are pressing these cell phones against their heads, holding them against their reproductive organs and other vital organs, and storing them in their pockets when we know these devices are emitting up to 11 times over the current guidelines?

 

-        Did you know recent studies have proven that 90% of cell phones on the market today exceed the Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure (SAR at 1.6 W/kg at 5mm) when the phones are tested as they are used in real life?

 

-        Did you know the federally mandated safety manual that comes with all chromebooks and laptops says to keep them at least 8 inches away from the body?

 

-        Did you know that for as little as a one time cost of $500 US dollars, every classroom could be provided with 40 Ethernet ports plus adapters for their wireless devices, costing about $20 per child, a small price to pay compared to brain surgery, chemotherapy, radiation treatments etc.? 

 

Our question is:  Will you protect our children from the health risks from the long-term exposure to microwave radiation in our schools? 

 

Respectfully,

 

Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools

Tuesday, 24 November 2020

Apple AirPods are the worst Christmas Present you can give someone, especially children!

 Have you read the safety manual for the Apple AirPod? 

To reduce exposure to RF energy, use the supplied headphones or other similar accessories. Carry iPod at least 5mm away from your body to ensure exposure levels remain at or below the as-tested levels.

https://www.apple.com/legal/rfexposure/ipod5,1/en/


Question:  How are you going to insert these AirPods in your ear if they have to be held 5mm away from your body?



Apple AirPods Pro - RF Radiation Investigation | Phone Calls & Music Playback

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln3_8MUOfEA

 

Airpods Emit Wireless Radiation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlPurjfKq4o&feature=emb_logo

 

RF Radiation from AirPods explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ub0FdIkQniI&feature=emb_logo

 


 

Sunday, 1 November 2020

Why is ISED not doing anything about cell phones that are in violation of Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure?

 -------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject: Why is ISED not doing anything about cell phones that are in violation of Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure?
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:05:03 -0700
From: Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
To: Ron.McKinnon@parl.gc.ca
CC: Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca, Luc.Theriault@parl.gc.ca, John.Barlow@parl.gc.ca, don.davies@parl.gc.ca, Chris.dEntremont@parl.gc.ca, Darren.Fisher@parl.gc.ca, Mike.Kelloway@parl.gc.ca, Larry.Maguire@parl.gc.ca, Marcus.Powlowski@parl.gc.ca, Sonia.Sidhu@parl.gc.ca, Tony.VanBynen@parl.gc.ca, Alistair.MacGregor@parl.gc.ca

Dear Ron McKinnon,

We have received no response from 11 staff members of the ISED, Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry, Deputy Minister, Simon Kennedy, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Paul Thompson, Associate Deputy Minister, Ana Maia, Corporate Secretary, Dawn Lumley-Myllari, Audit and Evaluation Branch Director General, Legal Services, Alain Vauclair, Senior General Counsel and Executive Director, Mitch Davies, Industry Sector Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Industry Sector, Mary Gregory, Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Charles Vincent, Industry Sector Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Andrea Johnston,  Innovation Canada Assistant Deputy Minister and Luc Delorme, Senior Director in the Spectrum Management Operations Branch, who were all individually addressed.

Parents, teachers and students want to know why the ISED has failed to do its due diligence by allowing thousands of innocent children to press these cell phones against their heads, hold them against their reproductive organs and other vital organs, and store them in their pockets when we know these cell phones are in violation of the Safety Code 6 guidelines?

Is it not the duty of the ISED to protect the public by enforcing theses guidelines and take immediate action to recall these cell phones? If not, who is responsible? 

Just in: A test by Penumbra Brands to measure how much wireless radiation an iPhone 11 Pro gives off found that the phone emits more than twice the amount allowable by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

... the Tribune and Penumbra both used off-the-shelf phones, the FCC largely tested phones supplied by the manufacturers, including Apple.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/telecom/wireless/radio-frequency-exposure-test-iphone-11-pro-double-fcc-limits

Respectfully, 

Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Why is ISED not doing anything about cell phones that are in violation of Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure?
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:32:00 -0700
From: Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
To: ISI.minister-ministre.ISI@canada.ca

Dear Navdeep Bains,

Parents, teachers and students want to know why the ISED is not educating thousands of innocent children on the safe use of cell phones and allowing them to press these cell phones against their heads, holding them against their reproductive organs and other vital organs, and storing them in their pockets when we know these devices are emitting 4 - 11 times over the current Safety Code 6 guidelines? 

We are waiting for a response.

Respectfully,

Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Why is ISED not doing anything about cell phones that are in violation of Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure?
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:51:10 -0700
From: Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
To: ISI.minister-ministre.ISI@canada.ca

Dear Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry,

Brian Ahier, Director Radiation Protection Bureau, in response to our letter said, “There are no standards applicable to cell phones or other wireless communication devices under the Radiation Emitting Devices Regulations. In Canada, the regulation of cell phones and other wireless communication devices is the responsibility of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED), under the Radiocommunication Act. To ensure that public exposures fall within acceptable guidelines, ISED has developed regulatory standards that require compliance with the human exposure limits outlined in Safety Code 6.  ISED conducts regular audits to help ensure that devices on the market and antenna installations are compliant.

 

We want to know why the ISED has failed to do its due diligence by allowing cell phones to be brought onto the market without any independent, practical/realistic-use safety testing? 

 

We want to know why the manufacturers of cell phones are allowed to self report and only have to submit a sample of a one new phone, sent directly from the factory, to comply with exposure standards that has been set by the industry?

 

We want to know why the federally mandated warnings and safety disclaimers are not made available to the public on the outside of the packaging at the point of sale and on the Health Canada website?

 

We want to know why the ISED is not educating thousands of innocent children on the safe use of cell phones and allowing them to press these cell phones against their heads, holding them against their reproductive organs and other vital organs, and storing them in their pockets when we know these devices are emitting 4 - 11 times over the current Safety Code 6 guidelines?  


The Chicago Tribune recently did an independent investigation into the cell phone scandal (Phonegate) and confirmed the findings that iphone 7 and other smart phones exceeded the Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure (SAR at 1.6 W/kg at 5mm).  Apple and Samsung are knowingly selling products that exceed allowable radiation limits and have failed to warn its consumers regarding radiation risks and the need to keep the phone at a safe distance away from the body.

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/press-release-revelation-of-the-chicago-tribune-on-the-tests-of-the-most-popular-cell-phones-in-the-united-states

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FCC-letter-20-march-2018.pdf


“The Chicago investigation confirms what the French National Agency has warned about for some time now that 90% of all the major cellphones tested (more than 450) emitted significantly higher levels of radiation exceeding the safety compliance standards, up to 5 times the current guidelines when phones are tested as they are used in real life. The current guidelines for the manufacturers is based on the 1990’s when people wore their standard flip phone on their hip in a holster about 1 “ away from your body.

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/press-release-the-flaws-in-the-control-of-mobile-phones-by-european-and-international-authorities

 

In a recent study by Professor Om Gandhi, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, he examined data from 450 cell phones and also confirmed that the phone can exceed the guidelines and emitted up to 11 times over the US FCC limit when used under realistic conditions.

 

  https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8688629

 

France has asked the European Commission to strengthen the regulations and guidelines for new mobile phones placed on the market. As recommended by ANSES, the Government has requested that the certification tests be carried out in regards to the contact with the device, and not at 5 mm as is currently the case, so that they are more representative of the real exposure of users.  France also asked for an information campaign to encourage changes in ways of use, especially among children.

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/french-ministerial-announcements-an-important-step-in-our-actions-to-protect-the-health-of-mobile-phone-users

 

The Italian court ordered the government (Ministries of the Environment and Education) to launch a campaign to advise the public of the health risks from mobile and cordless phones.  https://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/italian-decision-precaution

 

We want to know why your department is protecting the profits of a billion-dollar industry by allowing the sale of products on the market that exceed the federal guidelines, Safety Code 6 and not the health and well being of our children?

 

Looking forward to your respond to our concerning questions.

 

Respectfully,

Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools

 

 

Thursday, 30 July 2020

Why is Health Canada not doing anything about cell phones that exceed the Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure?


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Why is Health Canada not doing anything about cell phones that exceed the Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure?
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 20:39:49 -0700
From: Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
To: brian.ahier@canada.ca

Dear Brian Aheir, Director, Radiation Protection Bureau,

 

We want to know why Health Canada, which administers, under the Radiation Emitting Devices Act, the sale, lease and importation of radiation emitting devices has neglected to do its due diligence by allowing cell phones to be brought onto the market without any independent, practical/realistic-use safety testing? 


We want to know why the manufacturers of cell phones are allowed to self report and only have to submit a sample of a one new phone, sent directly from the factory, to comply with exposure standards that has been set by the industry?

 

We want to know why the federally mandated warnings and safety disclaimers are not made available to the public on the outside of the packaging at the point of sale and on the Health Canada website?

 

We want to know why Health Canada is not educating thousands of innocent children on the safe use of cell phones and allowing them to press these cell phones against their heads, holding them against their reproductive organs and other vital organs, and storing them in their pockets when we know these devices are emitting 4 - 11 times over the current Safety Code 6 guidelines?  


The Chicago Tribune recently did an independent investigation into the cell phone scandal (Phonegate) and confirmed the findings that iphone 7 and other smart phones exceeded the Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure (SAR at 1.6 W/kg at 5mm).  Apple and Samsung are knowingly selling products that exceed allowable radiation limits and have failed to warn its consumers regarding radiation risks and the need to keep the phone at a safe distance away from the body.

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/press-release-revelation-of-the-chicago-tribune-on-the-tests-of-the-most-popular-cell-phones-in-the-united-states

https://www.phonegatealert.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FCC-letter-20-march-2018.pdf


“The Chicago investigation confirms what the French National Agency has warned about for some time now that 90% of all the major cellphones tested (more than 450) emitted significantly higher levels of radiation exceeding the safety compliance standards, up to 5 times the current guidelines when phones are tested as they are used in real life. The current guidelines for the manufacturers is based on the 1990’s when people wore their standard flip phone on their hip in a holster about 1 “ away from your body.

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/press-release-the-flaws-in-the-control-of-mobile-phones-by-european-and-international-authorities

 

In a recent study by Professor Om Gandhi, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, he examined data from 450 cell phones and also confirmed that the phone can exceed the guidelines and emitted up to 11 times over the US FCC limit when used under realistic conditions.

 

  https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8688629

 

France has asked the European Commission to strengthen the regulations and guidelines for new mobile phones placed on the market. As recommended by ANSES, the Government has requested that the certification tests be carried out in regards to the contact with the device, and not at 5 mm as is currently the case, so that they are more representative of the real exposure of users.  France also asked for an information campaign to encourage changes in ways of use, especially among children.

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/french-ministerial-announcements-an-important-step-in-our-actions-to-protect-the-health-of-mobile-phone-users


The Italian court ordered the government (Ministries of the Environment and Education) to launch a campaign to advise the public of the health risks from mobile and cordless phones.  https://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/italian-decision-precaution

 

Why is Health Canada, a department of the Government of Canada that is responsible for the country's federal health policies, aggressively defending a billion-dollar industry and allowing the sale of products on the market that exceed the federal guidelines?

 

Looking forward to your response to our concerning questions.

Respectfully,

Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools

 

Wednesday, 24 June 2020

Health Canada is wilfully blind to the thousands of studies proving irriversible harm from wireless technology


From: Marcus  Schluschen  
To: ccrpb / pcrpcc (HC/SC)
Subject: Re: public deception
 
Ladies and Gentlemen of Health Canada,
 
Your response regarding Health Canada’s deliberate, dangerous, public deception, did not answer a single of my questions. 
 
In light of your unsigned response from one of your clerks, who are instructed to appease the uneducated public, I am requesting a signed reply from a senior manager, addressing my grievances. 
 
If Health Canada is unwilling to accommodate this reasonable request, please be so kind and have your legal department reply to me.
 
May I remind you, providing false information to the public, with intent to deceive, through your website, is unlawful in Canada?
 
Health Canada received countless research papers from EMF scientists, including medical EMF Guidelines from medical associations, and deeply concerned citizens, including myself, illustrating serious biological damage to humans, plants, insects and animals.

Today, international EMF research, showing irreversible harm to life, has climbed into the thousands!
 
It appears that the latest scientific understanding in EMF research must have escaped your agency, either by design or incompetence.
 
Must I remind you of the recent, 10 year, NTP and Ramazzini Studies, or the European Interphone StudyReflex StudySelbitz Study, the Hardell Group Studies, or the French CERENAT Study, which reflect only a tiny portion of today's available research, proving harm to all life?
 
If these studies are unfamiliar to you, I would be happy to provide the information to you.
 
Health Canada must be aware, that the Hardell Group Studies were released after the 2b cancer classification was made by the World Health Organization (WHO) and is one of the studies referenced by scientists arguing that, based on new research, the 2b classification should be re-evaluated as a class 2a (probably carcinogenic) or class 1 carcinogenic. 
 
During the last few years, countless peer reviewed papers have been published, proving harm to life, without a shadow of a doubt! 
 
Such  overwhelming scientific evidence, proving harm to all life, has resulted in international science and medical petitions, that this classification must urgently be changed, especially after the alarming results of the NTP and Ramazzini Studies were released.
 
Has the International Scientists Appeal escaped Health Canada’s attention as well? 
As of 2020, 253 EMF scientists from 44 nations signed the appeal, which states:
 
“It is our opinion that adverse health consequences of chronic and involuntary exposure of people to non-ionizing electromagnetic field sources are being ignored by national and international health organizations despite our repeated inquiries as well as inquiries made by many other concerned scientists, medical doctors and advocates. This constitutes a clear violation of human rights, as defined by the United Nations:
 
Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education.”
 
“By not taking action, the WHO is failing to fulfill its role as the preeminent international public health agency.”
 
“It is indeed shocking to note that the WHO EMF Project has endorsed the obsolete EMF-exposure guidelines set by a German NGO that provides guidance on EMF-exposure limits, the ICNIRP,  and is seeking to influence nations world-wide to “harmonize” EMF exposure standards with these guidelines, even though they are not sufficiently protective of humankind or nature and do not take into account the numerous health effects studies that have been published since the IARC evaluations.”     
 
As Canada’s premier health agency, it is YOUR DUTY to be informed of the brazen conflicts of interests at ICNIRP:  http://www.avaate.org/IMG/pdf/escrito_web_icnirp_ingles_final.pdf
 
How can Health Canada blindly accept anything from ICNIRP members, with established associations to the very industry they are supposed to be monitoring? 
 
According to ICNIRP’s statutes, no member of the Commission may take a job that, in the Commission's view, might endanger their scientific independence.
Only the most naive would accept their recommendations, but certainly not anyone with a modicum of education and modest intellect.
 
Unforgivably, even after thousands of published peer reviewed studies, of which some even underwent a second review process, by expert panels in the field of EMF sciences, Health Canada refuses to entertain the probability that their ‘opinions’ of non-ionizing radiation safety might be woefully obsolete.
 
Instead of counseling precaution, as other countries like Germany, France, etc. have done, to reduce radiation exposure for children and the frail, Health Canada has become a captured agency of industry, advocating no precaution of any kind, in complete violation of their mandate, which is to protect the health of all Canadians, which includes anyone suffering from electro hypersensitivity (EHS), like my wife and many others.   
 
Your officials seem to be lacking the knowledge that Canada is obligated, through signature, to honour its commitments to the Rio Declaration, which states:
“In order to protect the environment, the precautionary approach shall be widely applied by States according to their capabilities.  Where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent degradation.”
 
The Rio Declaration:
Principle 15 – the Precautionary Approach
 
80  “Principle 15 codified for the first time at the global level the precautionary approach, which indicates that lack of scientific certainty is no reason to postpone action to avoid potentially serious or irreversible harm to the environment.  Central to principal 15 is the element of anticipation, reflecting a requirement that effective environmental measures need to be based upon actions which take a long-term approach and which might anticipate changes on the basis of scientific knowledge.” 
 
In 2015, the HESA Committee admonished Health Canada for undue diligence, after 3 days of hearings, and made 12 recommendations.  
 
May I remind you of the admitted, ‘war gaming of science’, by your close friends of the telecom industry?
 
Your website reads like it was penned by the apostles of the wireless industry, not by credible researchers whose exclusive mandate is to protect public health.
 
Please be so kind and reply to my email, in a respectful manner, without sounding like lobbyists of the telecom industry.
 
Regards,
Marcus Schluschen