Wednesday, 13 June 2018

36 Year Old with Neck Tumor/Cell Phone Related: Santa Rosa 5G Small Cell Testimony

French school students to be banned from using mobile phones
Pupils will not be allowed to use phones on schools grounds after September

36 Year Old with Neck Tumor/Cell Phone Related: Santa Rosa 5G Small Cell Testimony
How many years of mandatory RF radiation exposure in our schools will it take for our children, who are the most vulnerable, to develop cancer? Health Officials say, "It's an acceptable risk."

Schools and Wi-Fi : Is Your Child Sitting Under This Radiation Emitting Device?  Are you okay with this?

Mobile phone cancer warning as malignant brain tumours double
“Brain tumours kill more children in the UK than any other cancer. It’s essential we fund more research to make kinder and safer treatments for young patients and understand why there is an increase in incidence rates .”

New Publication: Children Absorb 2-5 Times Higher Doses of Microwave Radiation than Adults, From Virtual Reality Systems
Children’s health specialists are concerned that higher exposures to unprecedented levels of microwave radiation pose risks of permanent damage to vision, hearing and brain development, and cancer.

Top mobile phone firms warning shareholders over devices' possible cancer risks - but fail to tell customers

5G Health Concerns Confirmed By Published Scientific Research RT News

Saturday, 2 June 2018

Requesting a response to the letter from Parents, Teachers and Students April 20, 2018

Please consider helping to keep the pressure on Prov. Health Officer Bonnie Henry because she needs to acknowledge the current science. If we are silent, she will think we are happy with the way things are!!!  Silence is consent.

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Requesting a response to the letter from Parents, Teachers and Students April 20, 2018
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 06:12:16 -0700
From: Janis Hoffmann <>

Dear Dr. Bonnie Henry,
We request that the BC Provincial Health Officer provide the public with an official response to the findings of the US National Toxicology Program Expert Panel who concluded that there is “Clear Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity” and the association of cancer in the heart and brain and cell phone radiation.  This is serious health and safety matter that will cause permanent damage to thousands of children in all our public schools. Currently it is mandatory that our children be exposed RF Microwave Radiation  with no way to shield themselves from this full body radiation, much like the rats used in this study.

Parents have been robbed of their right to decide if this chronic exposure, an established 2B carcinogen listed next to lead, DDT, methyl mercury, chloroform, and car exhaust is an acceptable risk or whether precautionary measures should be implemented given there is alternative simple solution.

More and more schools are applying a 'No cell phone' policy during school hours due to distractions that negatively impact learning. This has made a huge impact on the reduction of radiation exposure our children are experiencing in our classrooms.  However, the removal of the industrial strength Wi-Fi routers should implemented immediately and return to hard-wired Internet, which is faster, cheaper, more reliable, more secure and safer than wireless networks.

For as little as a one time cost of $500 US dollars every classroom would be provided with 40 Ethernet ports plus adapters for their wireless devices, costing about $20 per child, a small price to pay compared to brain surgery, chemotherapy, radiation treatments etc.

As the Provincial Health Office you have a duty to take reasonable steps to reduce wireless radiation in our schools given the overwhelming amount of evidence of harm that concerned parents have submitted.


Janis Hoffmann
Founder of Parentsforsafeschools
Vancouver Island Rep.

Saturday, 19 May 2018

The New England Journal of Medicine - Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code (signed by Canada)

Something is very wrong when parents, teachers and students have to send Government Officials, Health Officers and School Officials quotes from the Nuremberg Code to protect their children from the mandatory exposure to RF Radiation in our schools. The Nuremberg Code was written 20 years ago, and published in the New England Journal of Medicine to protect people from involuntary experiments.

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

Tom Wheeler, FCC, promotes 5G - No regulations, no testing...


You are probably wondering why is the media not reporting any of this information to the public?   Because the media is owned by the wireless industry giving them the opportunity to keep their secret from the public and protect their billion-dollar investment.  
Letter from Parent:

Sent: Monday, May 07, 2018 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: Response to concerns regarding the safety of radio frequency exposure

Dear Minister Bains,
Receiving scripted replies from governmental aids, is nothing short of an insult, as it implies, that we the public, are ignorant fools.

Over the last 8 years, I have read countless, peer reviewed science documents, regarding the dangers of non-ionizing radiation in two languages, and can say with certainty, that I am far more informed on this subject than Minister Bains and his uninformed aids.  Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada is indeed a captured agency, where corporate lobbyists set the tone.

I have first-hand experience of the suffering that electro sensitive people have to endure, on a daily basis, as my wife has been struggling with this agonizing man-made affliction, for almost 9 years.

I am fully aware, that government officials will not acknowledge any biological harm, because it would immediately open a floodgate of law suits, as they were negligent in public health protection, by allowing untested technology to be imposed on the unsuspecting public, through WiFi, Cell towers, and now 5G microcells to be released on the population, without any prior biological testing.

In violation of the Rio Declaration of 1992 and the Nuremberg Code, the Government of  Canada, is conducting unauthorized human experiments, on a monumental scale, in collusion with the wireless industry.  Exposing the uninformed population to biologically active, non-ionizing, microwave radiation pollution, through Public WiFi, cell towers, smart meters, and now 5G microcells, is revolting.

Most shockingly, these biological unauthorized experiments extend to schools and even hospitals, where children, severely ill and frail elderly patients are fighting for their lives! 

Not long ago, Health Canada endorsed asbestos, formaldehyde and DDT and considered AIDS a minor event.

Today, this very same incompetent, captured government agency, is once again failing Canadians most miserably, by endorsing, biologically active, untested wireless technology, by relying on the archaic Safety Code 6, which was intensely criticized by international science, as "non-protective".

This absurd reliance on Safety Code 6 allows corporations free and uncontrolled reign, irradiating people in their homes, workplaces, schools, hospitals and every public place imaginable, with biologically untested technology, absent of meaningful governmental scrutiny.

SC6, was originally intended for short visits of workers to industrial sites and was never intended for chronic, 24/7, radiation exposure, of the unborn, mothers and children, the frail and elderly, by a known toxic agent, penetrating homes, schools, and hospitals, without consent!

When have children's bedrooms and classrooms, become industrial sites?

Twenty three thousand (23.000) peer reviewed studies, proving adverse biological effects are dismissed by this government!
(Available at the University of Aachen, Germany)

Where is your "science based, decision making" as promised during the last election campaign?

Such incomprehensible reckless attitude and supreme arrogance, as exhibited by Health Canada and your department, constitutes a perversion of Hippocratic ethics, a lack of morality and reverence for human life.

Marcus Schluschen

Sunday, 6 May 2018

Parents, teachers and students want to know why the BC Provincial Health Officer has not done her due diligence and informed the School Boards about the health risks

PO Box 9648
Victoria BC

April 20, 2018

Dear Dr. Bonnie Henry,
Parents, teachers and students want to know why the BC Provincial Health Officer has not done her due diligence and informed the School Boards about the health risks from the prolonged and accumulative exposure to RF radiation emitting from wireless technology in our schools.

On March 26-29, 2018, the National Toxicology Program (NTP), a 10-year study costing the US 25 million dollars, had eleven experts review the reports from the NTP's cell phone radiation studies.  They concluded that exposure to cell phone radiation caused a rare cancer, malignant schwannoma in the heart, and incidences of glioma, a rare, aggressive and highly malignant brain cancer.

Conclusions were based on NTP’s scale of “clear evidence”, “some evidence”, “equivocal evidence”, and “no evidence”.  Clear Evidence being conclusive. 

"The evidence indicating wireless is carcinogenic has increased and can no longer be ignored," stated University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health Professor Emeritus Anthony B. Miller MD, Member of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of Canada and the UK, and Senior Medical Advisor to EHT who is also a long-term advisor to the World Health Organization.

Soon after, the Ramazzini Institute also completed the world's largest animal study on cell tower radiation and confirmed the findings of the National Toxicology Program link to Cancer. This information accompanied with the over 26,000 peer reviewed studies by scientists and medical experts  is more than enough evidence for you to apply the precautionary principal to protect our children.

In January 1998, The Wingspread Conference held a three-day academic conference where the Precautionary Principle was defined.  It was agreed the Precautionary Principle would be implemented when an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. The Precautionary Principle shifts the burden of proof, insisting that those responsible for an activity must vouch for its harmlessness and be held responsible if damage occurs.

Health is a Provincial Jurisdiction. Your duty and obligation as the Provincial Health Officer and as a Doctor is to implement the Precautionary Principle by honouring your Hippocratic Oath, “nil nocere” to do no harm and protect our children from this health crisis.

All schools now employ industrial wireless networks, exposing students and staff to ubiquitous microwave radiation without any way to shield or avoid this mandatory exposure. Parents have never been informed of the health risks or given their written consent to expose their children to microwave radiation in our schools. School Districts have refused to educate students, parents and staff on how to avoid excessive RFR exposure when handling wireless devices during class time as outlined in user manuals, requirements mandated by law. 

Vancouver Island School Boards have shifted the responsibility of potential lawsuits caused by this wireless technology to their School Medical Health Officer, Dr. Stanwick, who has endorsed the installation of a known 2b carcinogen in our schools and is unable to provide parents with any peer reviewed studies stating the safety of radiation exposure. Dr. Stanwick then shifted “the responsibility for professional oversight” to the Provincial Health Officer.

The BC Ministry of Education has stated they set educational standards, allocates funds and monitors student achievement but decisions regarding the planning and delivery of supports and services for all students are the responsibility of local boards of education and school district administrators. This includes decisions around exposure to RF frequencies and the use of WiFi in the classroom setting.

The Health Minister Philpott was also unable to provide parents with peer reviewed studies stating the safety of Wifi safety in our schools and has instead relied on Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 exposure “guidelines.” 

But on February 20, 2013, James McNamee, scientist for Health Canada, admitted in the Superior Court of Quebec, that the Safety Code 6 guideline for microwave radiation emitting from wireless technology is based ONLY on thermal effects, heating of the skin.  This means Canada does not have any regulations in place to protect the public from long-term exposure to the biological effects of the “non-thermal” levels of microwave radiation.
      On page 3, inside the Safety Code 6 document it states, “These guidelines apply to all individuals working at, or visiting, federally regulated sites and may also be adopted by the provinces, industry or other interested parties.”  Schools are not federally regulated sites and, therefore, SC 6 does not apply to wifi in schools.  The fact that the provinces may Adopt SC 6 means that the provinces are free to set their own guidelines.

In a report by Dr. Martin Pall he discusses Ken Foster and John Moulder, 2 industry affiliated scientists who, for years, have argued that there is no evidence of harm from exposure to microwave radiation. These 2 “bent” scientists have been on Health Canada panels and reviewed Safety Code 6, stating it is protective of non-thermal effects, when it applies to thermal effects only. On page 412 (8 of 12) he explains how they use poor science to help support wifi in schools, cell phones, etc
Tim Singer from Health Canada responded to a letter concerning the radiation levels in our schools by stating, Health Canada is aware of concerns related to Wi-Fi in schools, such decisions are not within Health Canada’s mandate. We recommend that you continue to consult your local school board or provincial authority to discuss your concerns.

The finger pointing has now gone full circle and it is obvious that Provincial Health Officer will be held accountable for wilfully ignoring the overwhelming amount of scientific proof of harm. 

Parents want to exercise their right to protect their children from harm and are calling on you to take immediate action to mitigate the risk and inform the School Boards throughout the province of the established health risks associated with long term exposure to microwave radiation by recommending the use of hard wired connections to access the Internet in our schools.

The burden of proof should not be put upon the public to prove that it’s unsafe, but upon the industry to prove it is safe.


Janis Hoffmann
Founder of Parentsforsafeschools
Vancouver Island Rep.

Tuesday, 3 April 2018

Parents want to know why, with the overwhelming amount of evidence of cancer, is it mandatory that our children be exposed to RF Radiation in our Schools?

Experts Find "Clear Evidence" of Cancer from Cell Phone Radiation in NTP Study
Eleven experts convened by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) over a three-day period to review the draft technical reports from the NTP's cell phone radiation studies concluded that there is "clear evidence" that exposure to cell phone radiation caused a rare cancer in the hearts of male rats, and "there is equivocal evidence" for the hearts of female rats.


2018 NTP Conclusions re: RF Microwave Radiation Studies in Rats

How Big Wireless Made Us Think That Cell Phones Are Safe: A Special Investigation
An excellent history of the industry, through various and well-known “bent” scientists deceiving the public, demeaning independent researchers, all to protect the telecoms who are knowingly exposing all of us to a very dangerous product. Just as guilty, IMHO, are the agencies such as Health Canada, Cancer Society, WHO which use the bent science to support the status quo, by deliberately misinforming the public about the unregulated wireless technology, which has never been tested for safety.
Lack of definitive proof that a technology is harmful does not mean the technology is safe, yet the wireless industry has succeeded in selling this logical fallacy to the world. In truth, the safety of wireless technology has been an unsettled question since the industry’s earliest days. The upshot is that, over the past 30 years, billions of people around the world have been subjected to a massive public-health experiment: Use a cell phone today, find out later if it causes cancer or genetic damage…


A report by Dr. Martin Pall “Wifi is an important threat to human health.”
Of special note: he discusses Ken Foster and John Moulder, 2 industry affiliated scientists who, for years, have argued that there is no evidence of harm from exposure to microwave radiation. These 2 “bent” scientists have been on Health Canada panels that have reviewed Safety Code 6, stating it is protective of non-thermal effects, when it applies to thermal effects only. On page 412 (8 of 12) he explains how they use poor science to help support wifi in schools, cell phones, etc. On page 411, 7 of 12 he speaks about the effects of RF on birds navigational systems. He concludes that evidence warrants use of hard wired access to the Internet in schools, restaurants, etc,, especially where children spend time.

Phonegate scandal goes unreported in Canadian media
The media is increasingly dependent upon the advertising revenue coming from Big Telecom, and naturally, you don’t bite the hand that feeds you.
9 out of 10 mobile phones tested in contact with the skin exceeded the regulatory threshold of 2 W/kg, some of them more than three times. No one paid attention to this information.


Diversity of media ownership literally non-existent in Canada
In terms of who has control over Canada’s English-language mediascape, the two biggest companies, Bell and Rogers, account for 43 per cent of all revenues. Add in Shaw and Telus, and these big four account for 70 per cent of the media landscape. All of these companies, with the exception of Telus, are vertically integrated in that they produce and distribute content across a range of media. In Quebec, Bell is the largest player, with an even larger share of one-third of the French-language mediascape.

The Ramazzini Institute Confirms the US National Toxicology Project Results: Cancers From Radio Frequency Radiation

World's Largest Animal Study on Cell Tower Radiation Confirms Cancer Link
"Our findings of cancerous tumors in rats exposed to environmental levels of RF are consistent with and reinforce the results of the US NTP studies on cell phone radiation, as both reported increases in the same types of tumors of the brain and heart in Sprague-Dawley rats. Together, these studies provide sufficient evidence to call for the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to re-evaluate and re-classify their conclusions regarding the carcinogenic potential of RFR in humans," said Fiorella Belpoggi PhD, study author and RI Director of Research…

"All of the exposures used in the Ramazzini study were below the US FCC limits. These are permissible exposures according the FCC. In other words, a person can legally be exposed to this level of radiation. Yet cancers occurred in these animals at these legally permitted levels. The Ramazzini findings are consistent with the NTP study demonstrating these effects are a reproducible finding," explained Ronald Melnick PhD, formerly the Senior NIH toxicologist who led the design of the NTP study on cell phone radiation now a Senior Science Advisor to Environmental Health Trust (EHT). "Governments need to strengthen regulations to protect the public from these harmful non-thermal exposures."

"The evidence indicating wireless is carcinogenic has increased and can no longer be ignored," stated University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health Professor Emeritus Anthony B. Miller MD, Member of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of Canada and the UK, and Senior Medical Advisor to EHT who is also a long-term advisor to the World Health Organization.

"This study raises concerns that simply living close to a cell tower will pose threats to human health. Governments need to take measures to reduce exposures from cell tower emissions. Cell towers should not be near schools, hospitals or people's homes. Public health agencies need to educate the public on how to reduce exposure from all sources of wireless radiofrequency radiation—be it from cell towers or cell phones or Wi-Fi in schools," stated David O. Carpenter MD, former Dean of the School of Public Health at the University at Albany. "This is particularly urgent because of current plans to place small 5G cell towers about every 300 meters in every street across the country. These 5G 'small cell' antennas will result in continuous exposure to everyone living nearby and everyone walking down the street. The increased exposures will increase risk of cancer and other diseases such as electro-hypersensitivity."


 Ramazzini Study on Base Station/Cell Tower Radiation: Press Conference 3/22/2018  

“Ramazzini’s Belpoggi Calls for IARC To Reassess RF–Cancer Risk”

Rats using cell phones are developing tumours!
Each of these studies have their weaknesses and often when someone doesn’t like the results they focus on the inherent weakness in the type of study being performed (like … study was with rats not people; experiment was under artificial conditions; what happens in a test tube may not happen in a living organism; there could be confounders that were not considered; etc.)

The real value of the Ramazzini study is that it confirms the results in the NTP study as both showed an increase in two types of tumours Schwannomas of the heart and malignant glial brain tumours. We have additional evidence from epidemiological studies that these two types of tumours (various types of brain tumours) and schwannomas (in this case vestibular schwannomas that affect the ear rather than the heart) as an acoustic neuroma are higher in people who use cell phones. We also have scientific evidence showing that RFR causes an increase in free-radicals that can cause cancer; that it causes increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier, that it interferes with calcium biochemistry, etc.

So, we have three types of studies pointing in the same direction. The tumours occur in humans under natural conditions; they occur in lab studies with rats at levels below existing international guidelines; and they occur in lab studies providing various mechanism (free-radical damage being only one probable cause).  See:  When theory and observation collide 2017.

Also, the NTP study is not the first but the second major study of microwave radiation and cancer in rats as the first one was conducted by Chou et al. in 1992. They found an increase in various tumours, especially primary tumours, for rats exposed to 2.4 GHz frequencies. It is the combination of studies that is important and all of these studies can’t be wrong!
Aggressive Brain Tumors on the Rise in England
The incidence of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the deadliest type of brain tumor, more than doubled in England between 1995 and 2015, according to a new analysis of national statistics. During that time, the number of cases of GBM rose from 983 to 2,531.
Canadian Study Finds Cell Phone Use Increases Risk For Brain Cancer
Governments have allowed this technology to pervade our lives saying it did not have proof it could harm us. We now have evidence from the latest Canadian Interphone study data that found a statistically significant doubling of risk for glioma among cell phone users with only 558 lifetime hours of use.

How long will it take a teenager to amass 558 hours of cell phone use?

5G: Cancer, Cell Phone, Wi-Fi, Cell Tower, Wireless Radiation Health Effects

ConsumerWatch: 5G Cellphone Towers Signal Renewed Concerns Over Impacts on Health.  (4:52)

The National Firefighters are the only group of people who have been granted by the US legislature, an exemption of the health risks with the installation of the cell towers

Has Telus installed Small Cells in your neighbourhood?

5G: Cancer, Cell Phone, Wi-Fi, Cell Tower, Wireless Radiation Health Effects (8:52)
Wireless technology is unregulated and never been tested for safety on children and the unborn.


Must Watch! Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity  (8:22)

People who are Electrosensitivity to wireless devices such as cell phones, tablets, laptop computers and nearby cell towers are becoming increasingly recognized. Symptoms include headaches, insomnia, dizziness, irritability, fatigue, heart palpitations, poor concentration, and neuropsychiatric problems such as depression. “Microwave illness”  (aka electrosensitivity or electrohypersensitivity or EHS or Microwave Syndrome) was described in the military in the 1970’s with a wave of ensuing research confirming these effects.

Erica Mallery-Blythe, MD (15:12)
For many years, Dr. Mallery-Blythe has worked intensively with adults and children suffering from the little-understood biological and health effects of wireless technologies, working closely with their doctors. She is author of a resource for parents, teachers, schools and policymakers called “Electromagnetic Health for Children”.