Dear Mr.
Andrew Green and Ms. Kim
Oldham,
Our
elected Government Officials and
our Provincial Health Officer have failed to do their due
diligence by willfully
closing their eyes to our
requests for answers regarding the safety of our children in
school. They have
instead deliberately overstepped the
fundamental rights of parents by installing unregulated wireless radiation, a 2b
carcinogen, and allowing the use of cellphones and personal
devices in all schools without consultation or
consent, robbing us/parents of our legal right to manage and protect
our children's health and
continued well-being.
Our government
officials and health officer have dismissed all credible health
information
presented to them from qualified experts, nationally and
internationally, who
emphasize children's heightened vulnerabilities and the need for
"precautionary" measures to reduce exposure and the risk of
permanent
health effects.
It’s clear that the constant use of
cell phones is interfering
with our children’s ability to interact and develop healthy
relationships in
the real world. This addiction is robbing our children of the
opportunity
to build life skills that include critical thinking,
communication,
cooperation, and the ability to focus in the classroom.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/technology-children-negative-impact_b_3343245
Besides the negative impact this addiction has on learning, parents, teachers and students are aware of the SCIENTIFIC FACT that microwave radiation exposure causes biological effects confirming the growing evidence of neurological effects and developmental delays with irreversible health effects, such as Depression, Suicide, Violence, Anxiety, Autism, Addiction, Behavioral Issues, Heart Episodes, Infertility, ADD/ADHD, Compromised Ability to Learn, Headaches, Nose/Ear Bleeds, Brain Fog, Difficulty Concentrating, and Cancer. As documented in over 29,000 published peer-reviewed studies by scientists and medical experts. https://www.emf-portal.org/en
And now recent studies have proven
that 90% of cell phones on the
market today exceed the
Safety Code 6 guidelines for
radiation exposure (SAR at 1.6
W/kg at 5mm) when the
phones are tested as they are used in
real life. Children
attending school are pressing these
cell phones against their heads, holding
them against
their reproductive organs and other vital organs, and
storing them in
their pockets when we know these devices are emitting 4 - 11
times over the
current guidelines.
PRESS RELEASE: The Court of Appeal of Turin confirmed
in a full judgment
published on 13 January 2020 (904/2019 of 3.12.2019 , Romeo v.
INAIL) the
decision of the Tribunal of Ivrea of 2017. Judge Fadda
considers that the
worker’s acoustic neuroma (benign tumour of the head) was
indeed caused by the
use of the mobile phone
"“there is protective scientific jurisprudence that
supports the
assertion of causation based on criteria of “more likely than
not”. P.33.”...
“Epidemiological data, the results of experiments on
animals (not
contradicted, at present, by other experiments of the same
type), the duration
and intensity of exposure … which are particularly important
in view of the
dose-response relationship established – at the scientific
level – between
exposure to mobile phone radiofrequencies and the risk of
acoustic neuroma, as
well as the absence of any other factor which could have
caused the
disease”....
“strong evidence to assert a causal
role between the
complainant’s occupational exposure, his exposure to radiation
from mobile
phones and the disease that occurred”.
All
these facts combined have only confirmed our concerns about the
permanent
health risks from the use of wireless technology leaving us to
understand that the School
Protection Program is assuming full financial responsibility to
compensate
students and staff who develop cancers/illnesses from the
adverse reactions to
wireless radiation emitting devices.
Parents,
teachers and students want to know
why the BC government and the Provincial Health Officer, has
refused to “act in
good faith,” by fulfilling their moral and legal obligation, to
protect our
children, while under their care in our schools?
To start, we are asking for the BC
government to follow Ontario’s lead
and ban cellphones and personal devices in our schools. https://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2019/10/we-want-to-know-why-bc-is-not-banning.html
Respectfully,
Janis
Hoffmann
Parents
for Safe Schools
250-478-7976
No comments:
Post a Comment