Letter #6 Dear BC Minister of Education, Will you protect our children’s health by connecting to the Internet by using hard-wired fiber optics?

 

From: Safetecinschools <citizens4safetec@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:03 AM
Subject: Letter #6 Dear BC Minister of Education, Will you protect our children’s health by connecting to the Internet by using hard-wired fiber optics?
To: <educ.minister@gov.bc.ca>

 

Dear BC Minister of Education, Jennifer Whiteside,

 

-       Did you know most of the media is owned by the wireless industry?

 

-       Did you know that the small independent media outlets rely on the wireless industry for their advertising dollars to survive?

 

-       Did you know the media refuses to inform the public’s “right to know” about the health risks from microwave radiation exposure?

 

-       Did you know the wireless industry “war-gamed the science” by funding industry friendly studies and attacking independent scientists and medical experts?

 

-       Did you know Canada’s big telecom companies and our government officials have met an average of twice every business day?

 

-       Did you know collectively, the companies met with CRTC chairman Ian Scott 11 times and Navdeep Bains, who was minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development until he stepped down in January, 13 times?

 

-       Did you know the prime minister in December named Michael Sabia, who was chief executive of Bell Canada Enterprises for six years, to the deputy finance minister post and Ian Scott, a former Telus lobbyist, the CRTC chair?

 

-       Did you know all levels of government have been infiltrated by the wireless industry to protect their interest?

 

-       Did you know the wireless industry is one of the fastest growing on Earth, raking in annual sales of $440 billion in 2016?

 

-       Did you know that protecting the profits of the wireless industry is more important than the health and well being of our children?

 

Our question is: Will you protect our children’s health by connecting to the Internet by using hard-wired fiber optics?

 

Respectfully,

 

Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools

 

https://www.democracynow.org/2018/4/5/how_the_wireless_industry_convinced_the

 

https://techstartups.com/2020/09/18/6-corporations-control-90-media-america-illusion-choice-objectivity-2020/

 

https://blogs.teksavvy.com/big-telecom-lobbies-ottawa-twice-a-day

 

Letter #1  http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/01/will-you-protect-our-children-from.html

 

Letter #2  http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/01/2-dear-bc-minister-of-education-is_19.html

 

Letter #3 http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/02/3-dear-bc-minister-of-education-will.html

Letter #4   http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/02/4-dear-bc-minister-of-education-why-is.html

 

Letter #5  http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/03/letter-5-dear-bc-minister-of-education.html

Letter #5 Dear BC Minister of Education, Why would you jeopardize our children’s health and well being by relying on old outdated information from Health Canada and Safety Code 6?

From: Safetecinschools <citizens4safetec@gmail.com>

Date: Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 2:02 PM
Subject: #5 Dear BC Minister of Education, Why would you jeopardize our children’s health and well being by relying on old outdated information from Health Canada and Safety Code 6?
To: <educ.minister@gov.bc.ca>

Dear BC Minister of Education, Jennifer Whiteside,

-        Did you know Canada does not have any regulations in place to protect the public from the long-term exposure to the biological effects of the “non-thermal” levels of microwave radiation emitting from wireless technology?

-        Did you know that in 2013, James McNamee, scientist for Health Canada, admitted in the Superior Court of Quebec, that the Safety Code 6 guidelines for microwave radiation emitting from wireless technology is based ONLY on thermal effects, heating of the skin?

-        Did you know Safety Code 6 was first published in 1979 and was based on the premise that if microwave radiation did not heat, it would not harm living tissue?

-        Did you know the safety information for Safety Code 6 is based on a 200-pound (91 kg) mannequin with a cell phone testing only for temperature changes not for any of the biological effects such as DNA damage?

-        Did you know there are thousands of peer-reviewed studies by scientists and medical experts proving serious health risks from the prolonged and accumulative exposure to microwave radiation dating as far back as 1970?

-       Did you know that Health Canada have willfully dismissed 140 peer reviewed studies in 2015 presented to them from qualified experts, nationally and internationally, which emphasizes the need for "precautionary" measures to reduce exposure and risk from the harmful effects?

-        Did you known that Health Canada’s summary of studies consist of 19 studies ranging from 1983 before the World Health Organization declare RF as a 2B carcinogen, in 2011, to 2012, then jumping to 2016?

-        Did you know Health Canada had announced their support for a 2016 study by James McNamee, et al., done in 2012, where mice were exposed for 4 hours over 5 days and concluded no evidence of harm, claiming it was the most comprehensive study of its type ever done?

 -        Did you know Health Canada was unable to provide parents with ONE peer reviewed study by a scientist or medical expert stating, “Exposure to microwave radiation is safe for children and the unborn?”

 

Our question is: Why would you jeopardize our children’s health and well being by relying on old outdated information from Health Canada and Safety Code 6 when there is a safer alternative to connect to the Internet? 

 

Respectfully, 

Janis Hoffmann 

Parents for Safe Schools

https://magdahavas.com/electrosmog-exposure/legal-issues/health-canada-admits-safety-code-6-guideline-for-microwave-radiation-is-based-only-on-thermal-effects/

https://www.appel5gappeal.ca/eng/fact-checker.php

https://www.c4st.org/images/hesa-2015/submissions/C4ST-Submission-to-MOH-re-140-Missing-Studies-E.pdf

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27028625

Letter #1  http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/01/will-you-protect-our-children-from.html

Letter #2  http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/01/2-dear-bc-minister-of-education-is_19.html

Letter #3 http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/02/3-dear-bc-minister-of-education-will.html

Letter #4   http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/02/4-dear-bc-minister-of-education-why-is.html

 

From: Safetecinschools <citizens4safetec@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 7:20 PM
Subject: Radiation risk to Central Okanagan students’ presentation rejected
To: <edit@kelownacapnews.com>
Cc: <Moyra.Baxter@sd23.bc.ca>, <Amy.Geistlinger@sd23.bc.ca>, <lee-ann.tiede@sd23.bc.ca>, <Chantelle.Desrosiers@sd23.bc.ca>, <Julia.Fraser@sd23.bc.ca>, <rolli.cacchioni@sd23.bc.ca>, <Kevin.Kaardal@sd23.bc.ca>, <tmooring@bctf.ca>, <educ.minister@gov.bc.ca>, <DM.Education@gov.bc.ca>, <Sally.Barton@gov.bc.ca>, <ddavis@ehtrust.org>

Dear Barry Gerding,

 

Re: Radiation risk to Central Okanagan students’ presentation rejected

https://www.kelownacapnews.com/news/radiation-risk-to-central-okanagan-students-presentation-rejected/  

We would like to applaud School Trustee, Amy Geistlinger for taking the initiative to try to education the trustees of Central Okanagan Public Schools on the health effects of mandatory exposure of microwave radiation in our schools.  It takes leadership to challenge what is popular and address the need for more education on the safe use of wireless technology.

 

Amy Giestlinger has done her due diligence by asking for all credible health information be presented to the trustees from qualified experts, nationally and internationally, who emphasize children's heightened vulnerabilities and the need for "precautionary" measures to reduce exposure and the risk of permanent health effects.

 

It is obvious that Amy Giestlinger is trying in good faith to fulfill her moral and legal obligation, to protect our children, while under her care in our schools.

 

Parents, teachers and students who have expressed their concerns in the past, only to have them ignored, would like to Thank You Amy!

 

Respectfully,

 

Janis Hoffmann 

Parents for Safe Schools

Letter submitted to all BC School Trustees from Scientist and Medical Expert, Dr. Devra Davis

https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Letter-to-Colleges-and-Schools-2020-letter-on-Wi-Fi-and-Cell-Phones-.pdf

 

 

#4 Dear BC Minister of Education, Why are our School Officials not educating our children to follow the federally mandated Safety Manual?

From: Safetecinschools <citizens4safetec@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:59 PM
Subject: #4 Dear BC Minister of Education, Why are our School Officials not educating our children to follow the federally mandated Safety Manual?
To: <educ.minister@gov.bc.ca>

Dear BC Minister of Education, Jennifer Whiteside, 

 - Did you know Apple says, “Read all safety information below and operating instructions before using iPad to avoid injury?” 

- Did you know the manual warns that if a user does not handle the iPad exactly as instructed, the radiation level will exceed governments’ exposure limits for humans? 

 - Did you know the iPad has five antennas? 

 - Did you know when your child is holding an iPad in portrait mode on their lap or near their chest; the microwave radiation is penetrating their internal organs? 

- Did you know that every female is born with all the eggs they will ever have to reproduce? 

- Did you know when your child is holding an iPad in landscape mode their hands are covering the transmitting antennas and absorbing microwave radiation directly into their bodies? 

- Did you know an iPad emits a burst of microwave radiation approximately every four seconds? 

 - Did you know that makes 900 blasts per hour in 
the child’s hands, on their lap, or at their face? 

- Did you know the WHO states: “The general population receives the highest exposure from transmitters close to the body... In children... deposition of RF energy may be two times higher in the brain and up to ten times higher in the bone marrow of the skull than in adult users?” 

 - Did you know the Safety Manual warns of Seizures, Blackouts, and Eyestrain, stating that a small percentage of people may be susceptible to blackouts or seizures (even if they have never had one before) when exposed to flashing lights or light patterns such as when playing games or watching video? That if you have experienced seizures or blackouts or have a family history of such occurrences, you should consult a physician before playing games or watching videos on your iPad. 

 - Did you know the Safety Manual says to discontinue use of iPad and consult a physician if you experience headaches, blackouts, seizures, convulsion, eye or muscle twitching, loss of awareness, involuntary movement, or disorientation? And to reduce risk of headaches, blackouts, seizures, and eyestrain, avoid prolonged use, hold iPad some distance from your eyes, use iPad in a well-lit room, and take frequent breaks. 

Our question is: Why are our School Officials not educating our children to follow the federally mandated Safety Manual that comes with every wireless device? 

Respectfully, 

Janis Hoffmann 

Parents for Safe Schools 

 https://manuals.info.apple.com/MANUALS/1000/MA1524/en_U/iPad_Important_Product_Information_Guide.pdf 

https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snt2uaQd_Ps&feature=youtu.be 

Letter #1 http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/01/will-you-protect-our-children-from.html 

Letter #2 http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/01/2-dear-bc-minister-of-education-is_19.html

 Letter #3 http://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2021/02/3-dear-bc-minister-of-education-will.html

The studies for letter #2 Dear BC Minister of Education, Jennifer Whiteside

Parents, teachers and students are frustrated because the BC Government, Health Officials and School Officials have willfully dismissed all credible health information presented to them from qualified experts, nationally and internationally, which emphasizes children's heightened vulnerabilities and the need for "precautionary" measures to reduce exposure and risk from the harmful effects.

In a letter dated Nov. 19, 2014, Dr. Richard Stanwick, School Medical Officer, responded to my request to hard wired the classrooms so my grandson could attend school by stating: Upon review of the evidence, the prevailing position in this province from experts at the federal, provincial and regional levels is that the evidence reveals that Wi-Fi exposure in schools does not pose a level of risk that is unacceptable. This position is held by the other chief medical health officers in the province, Provincial Health Officer, Ministry of Health and other federal and provincial agencies. 

In 2011 the WHO / International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified radio frequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group2B), based on an increased risk for glioma, a malignant type of brain cancer1, associated with wireless phone use. 

https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf 

In March 2018, the National Toxicology Program (NTP), a 10-year study on 2G and 3G technologies found “Clear Evidence” of cancer in the heart and brain from the prolonged exposure to wireless radiation from cell phones. 

 https://ehtrust.org/cell-phone-radiofrequency-radiation-study/ 

NOTE: There have been no long-term studies on 4G and 5G. 

Soon after, the Ramazzini Institute also completed the world's largest animal study on cell tower radiation and confirmed the findings of the National Toxicology Program increased risk of malignant heart tumors. 

https://ehtrust.org/worlds-largest-animal-study-on-cell-tower-radiation-confirms-cancer-link/ 

Ronald Melnick PhD, formerly the Senior NIH toxicologist who led the design of the NTP study on cell phone radiation now a Senior Science Advisor to Environmental Health Trust (EHT) stated, "All of the exposures used in the Ramazzini study were below the US FCC limits. These are permissible exposures according the FCC. In other words, a person can legally be exposed to this level of radiation. Yet cancers occurred in these animals at these legally permitted levels. The Ramazzini findings are consistent with the NTP study demonstrating these effects are a reproducible finding." "The evidence indicating wireless is carcinogenic has increased and can no longer be ignored," stated University of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health Professor Emeritus Anthony B. Miller MD, Member of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of Canada and the UK, and Senior Medical Advisor to EHT who is also a long-term advisor to the World Health Organization. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=bgGJeOVEdQs 

Over 240 scientists, who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic fields, or EMF, signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger RF exposure limits. 

https://www.emfscientist.org/ 

Researcher Zorach Glaser, Ph.D. spent decades archiving over 4,000 studies beginning from 1961 that examine the association of certain health issues and exposure to microwave and radio frequencies. 

https://magdahavas.com/from-zorys-archive/introduction-to-from-zorys-archive/ 

BioInitiative Report 2012 The RF Color Charts summarize many studies that report biological effects and adverse health effects relevant for cell towers, WI-FI, ‘smart’ wireless utility meters, wireless laptops, baby monitors, cell phones and cordless phones. 

https://bioinitiative.org/rf-color-charts/ 

Published Studies on Wi-Fi and the Biological Effects 

 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1J3dsvi6O62OJEXk7pPp9fDpqA8VMQIvr/view?usp=sharing 

Please educate your family on how they can reduce their exposure to radiation from wireless technology. http://c4st.org/reduce-exposure-from-wireless-transmitting-devices/ 

 Janis Hoffmann

#3 Dear BC Minister of Education will you allow parents to make an informed decision on the use of wireless technology in our schools?

From: Safetecinschools <citizens4safetec@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 12:34 PM
Subject: #3 Dear BC Minister of Education will you allow parents to make an informed decision on the use of wireless technology in our schools?
To: <educ.minister@gov.bc.ca>

Dear BC Minister of Education, Jennifer Whiteside, 

- Did you know that talking on your cell phone 2-1/2 hours a month (not more than 30 minutes a week) is considered "a heavy user"? 

- Did you know a Canadian study found 558 hours of cell phone use can more than a doubled the risk of brain cancer? 

- Did you know the Chicago Tribune recently did an independent investigation into the cell phone scandal (Phonegate) and confirmed the findings that iPhone 7 and other smart phones exceeded the Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure? 

- Did you know Apple and Samsung are knowingly selling products that exceed allowable radiation limits and have failed to warn its consumers regarding radiation risks and the need to keep the phone at a safe distance away from the body? 

- Did you know the Chicago investigation also confirmed what the French National Agency has warned about for some time that 90% of all the major cellphones tested (more than 450) emitted significantly higher levels of radiation exceeding the safety compliance standards, up to 5 times the current guidelines when phones are tested as they are used in real life?

 - Did you know a recent study by Professor Om Gandhi examined data from 450 cell phones and also confirmed that the phone can exceed the guidelines and emitted up to 11 times over the US FCC limit when used under realistic conditions?

 - Did you know the Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED), has failed to do its due diligence by allowing cell phones to be brought onto the market without any independent, practical/realistic-use safety testing?

 - Did you know the manufacturers of cell phones are allowed to self report and only have to submit a sample of a one new phone, sent directly from the factory, to comply with exposure standards that has been set by the industry? 

- Did you know Rob Fleming, previous Minister of Education, had refused to follow Ontario’s lead and ban cellphones and personal devices in our schools, when his child is attending the only school in Victoria with a cell phone ban? 

- Did you know Rob Fleming has denied parents the opportunity to make an informed decision for their children, on the cell phone ban in BC? 

Our question is: Will you allow parents to make an informed decision on the use of wireless technology in our schools? 

Respectfully, 

Janis Hoffmann 

Parents for Safe Schools 

https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/102/13/928/872178 

https://ehtrust.org/canadian-study-finds-cell-phone-use-increases-risk-for-brain-cancer/ 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28535174 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/press-release-revelation-of-the-chicago-tribune-on-the-tests-of-the-most-popular-cell-phones-in-the-united-states 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FCC-letter-20-march-2018.pdf 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/press-release-the-flaws-in-the-control-of-mobile-phones-by-european-and-international-authorities 

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8688629 

https://parentsforasafeschool.blogspot.com/2019/10/we-want-to-know-why-bc-is-not-banning.html

#2 Dear BC Minister of Education, is microwave radiation from wireless technology safe for our children in school?

From: Safetecinschools <citizens4safetec@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 9:33 AM
Subject: #2 Dear BC Minister of Education, is microwave radiation from wireless technology safe for our children in school?
To: <educ.minister@gov.bc.ca>

Dear BC Minister of Education, Jennifer Whiteside, 

- Did you know that the Medical Definition of Microwave Sickness is: a condition of impaired health first reported in the Russian medical literature that is characterized by headaches, anxiety, sleep disturbances, fatigue, and difficulty in concentrating and by changes in the cardiovascular and central nervous systems and that is held to be caused by prolonged exposure to low-intensity microwave radiation? 

 - Did you know that thousands of peer-reviewed studies show adverse health effects from wireless radiation exposure including cancer, neurological harm, abnormal brain development and reproductive health problems? 

- Did you know that a $30 million dollar, 10-year study by the US National Toxicology Program on 2G and 3G technologies found “Clear Evidence” of cancer in the heart and brain from the prolonged exposure to wireless radiation from cell phones? 

- Did you know there have been NO long-term studies done on 4G and 5G technologies? 

- Did you know another long term study by the Ramazzini Institute also found that exposure to wireless radiation from distant cell towers was associated with a increased risk of malignant heart tumors confirming the results of the NTP study? 

 - Did you know that a researcher Zorach Glaser, Ph.D. spent decades archiving over 4,000 studies beginning from 1961 that examine the association of certain health issues and exposure to microwave and radio frequencies? 

 - Did you know that over 240 scientists who have published peer-reviewed research on the biologic and health effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields, or EMF, signed the International EMF Scientist Appeal, which calls for stronger RF exposure limits? 

 - Did you know that the BC Government, Health Officials and School Officials have willfully dismissed all credible health information presented to them from qualified experts, nationally and internationally, which emphasizes children's heightened vulnerabilities and the need for "precautionary" measures to reduce exposure and risk from the harmful effects? 

 - Did you know that Canada agreed the Precautionary Principle would be implemented when an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically?

 Our question is: Can you send us ONE peer reviewed study by a scientist or medical expert stating, “exposure to microwave radiation is safe for children and the unborn.” 

 Respectfully, 

Janis Hoffmann 

Parents for Safe Schools 

https://www.merriam-webster.com/medical/microwave%20sickness

 

https://scienceblogs.com/effectmeasure/2008/01/23/wingspread-statement-on-the-pr

https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf 

 

https://ehtrust.org/cell-phone-radiofrequency-radiation-study/ 

 

https://ehtrust.org/worlds-largest-animal-study-on-cell-tower-radiation-confirms-cancer-link/ 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=bgGJeOVEdQs 

 

https://www.emfscientist.org/

 

https://magdahavas.com/from-zorys-archive/introduction-to-from-zorys-archive/ 

 

https://bioinitiative.org/rf-color-charts/ 

 

 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1J3dsvi6O62OJEXk7pPp9fDpqA8VMQIvr/view?usp=sharing