Tuesday, 24 November 2020

Apple AirPods are the worst Christmas Present you can give someone, especially children!

 Have you read the safety manual for the Apple AirPod? 

To reduce exposure to RF energy, use the supplied headphones or other similar accessories. Carry iPod at least 5mm away from your body to ensure exposure levels remain at or below the as-tested levels.

https://www.apple.com/legal/rfexposure/ipod5,1/en/


Question:  How are you going to insert these AirPods in your ear if they have to be held 5mm away from your body?



Apple AirPods Pro - RF Radiation Investigation | Phone Calls & Music Playback

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ln3_8MUOfEA

 

Airpods Emit Wireless Radiation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlPurjfKq4o&feature=emb_logo

 

RF Radiation from AirPods explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ub0FdIkQniI&feature=emb_logo

 


 

Sunday, 1 November 2020

Why is ISED not doing anything about cell phones that are in violation of Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure?

 -------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject: Why is ISED not doing anything about cell phones that are in violation of Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure?
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2020 12:05:03 -0700
From: Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
To: Ron.McKinnon@parl.gc.ca
CC: Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca, Luc.Theriault@parl.gc.ca, John.Barlow@parl.gc.ca, don.davies@parl.gc.ca, Chris.dEntremont@parl.gc.ca, Darren.Fisher@parl.gc.ca, Mike.Kelloway@parl.gc.ca, Larry.Maguire@parl.gc.ca, Marcus.Powlowski@parl.gc.ca, Sonia.Sidhu@parl.gc.ca, Tony.VanBynen@parl.gc.ca, Alistair.MacGregor@parl.gc.ca

Dear Ron McKinnon,

We have received no response from 11 staff members of the ISED, Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry, Deputy Minister, Simon Kennedy, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada, Paul Thompson, Associate Deputy Minister, Ana Maia, Corporate Secretary, Dawn Lumley-Myllari, Audit and Evaluation Branch Director General, Legal Services, Alain Vauclair, Senior General Counsel and Executive Director, Mitch Davies, Industry Sector Senior Assistant Deputy Minister, Industry Sector, Mary Gregory, Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Charles Vincent, Industry Sector Associate Assistant Deputy Minister, Andrea Johnston,  Innovation Canada Assistant Deputy Minister and Luc Delorme, Senior Director in the Spectrum Management Operations Branch, who were all individually addressed.

Parents, teachers and students want to know why the ISED has failed to do its due diligence by allowing thousands of innocent children to press these cell phones against their heads, hold them against their reproductive organs and other vital organs, and store them in their pockets when we know these cell phones are in violation of the Safety Code 6 guidelines?

Is it not the duty of the ISED to protect the public by enforcing theses guidelines and take immediate action to recall these cell phones? If not, who is responsible? 

Just in: A test by Penumbra Brands to measure how much wireless radiation an iPhone 11 Pro gives off found that the phone emits more than twice the amount allowable by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

... the Tribune and Penumbra both used off-the-shelf phones, the FCC largely tested phones supplied by the manufacturers, including Apple.

https://spectrum.ieee.org/tech-talk/telecom/wireless/radio-frequency-exposure-test-iphone-11-pro-double-fcc-limits

Respectfully, 

Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Why is ISED not doing anything about cell phones that are in violation of Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure?
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:32:00 -0700
From: Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
To: ISI.minister-ministre.ISI@canada.ca

Dear Navdeep Bains,

Parents, teachers and students want to know why the ISED is not educating thousands of innocent children on the safe use of cell phones and allowing them to press these cell phones against their heads, holding them against their reproductive organs and other vital organs, and storing them in their pockets when we know these devices are emitting 4 - 11 times over the current Safety Code 6 guidelines? 

We are waiting for a response.

Respectfully,

Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Why is ISED not doing anything about cell phones that are in violation of Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure?
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:51:10 -0700
From: Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
To: ISI.minister-ministre.ISI@canada.ca

Dear Navdeep Bains, Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry,

Brian Ahier, Director Radiation Protection Bureau, in response to our letter said, “There are no standards applicable to cell phones or other wireless communication devices under the Radiation Emitting Devices Regulations. In Canada, the regulation of cell phones and other wireless communication devices is the responsibility of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED), under the Radiocommunication Act. To ensure that public exposures fall within acceptable guidelines, ISED has developed regulatory standards that require compliance with the human exposure limits outlined in Safety Code 6.  ISED conducts regular audits to help ensure that devices on the market and antenna installations are compliant.

 

We want to know why the ISED has failed to do its due diligence by allowing cell phones to be brought onto the market without any independent, practical/realistic-use safety testing? 

 

We want to know why the manufacturers of cell phones are allowed to self report and only have to submit a sample of a one new phone, sent directly from the factory, to comply with exposure standards that has been set by the industry?

 

We want to know why the federally mandated warnings and safety disclaimers are not made available to the public on the outside of the packaging at the point of sale and on the Health Canada website?

 

We want to know why the ISED is not educating thousands of innocent children on the safe use of cell phones and allowing them to press these cell phones against their heads, holding them against their reproductive organs and other vital organs, and storing them in their pockets when we know these devices are emitting 4 - 11 times over the current Safety Code 6 guidelines?  


The Chicago Tribune recently did an independent investigation into the cell phone scandal (Phonegate) and confirmed the findings that iphone 7 and other smart phones exceeded the Safety Code 6 guidelines for radiation exposure (SAR at 1.6 W/kg at 5mm).  Apple and Samsung are knowingly selling products that exceed allowable radiation limits and have failed to warn its consumers regarding radiation risks and the need to keep the phone at a safe distance away from the body.

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/press-release-revelation-of-the-chicago-tribune-on-the-tests-of-the-most-popular-cell-phones-in-the-united-states

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/FCC-letter-20-march-2018.pdf


“The Chicago investigation confirms what the French National Agency has warned about for some time now that 90% of all the major cellphones tested (more than 450) emitted significantly higher levels of radiation exceeding the safety compliance standards, up to 5 times the current guidelines when phones are tested as they are used in real life. The current guidelines for the manufacturers is based on the 1990’s when people wore their standard flip phone on their hip in a holster about 1 “ away from your body.

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/press-release-the-flaws-in-the-control-of-mobile-phones-by-european-and-international-authorities

 

In a recent study by Professor Om Gandhi, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, he examined data from 450 cell phones and also confirmed that the phone can exceed the guidelines and emitted up to 11 times over the US FCC limit when used under realistic conditions.

 

  https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=8688629

 

France has asked the European Commission to strengthen the regulations and guidelines for new mobile phones placed on the market. As recommended by ANSES, the Government has requested that the certification tests be carried out in regards to the contact with the device, and not at 5 mm as is currently the case, so that they are more representative of the real exposure of users.  France also asked for an information campaign to encourage changes in ways of use, especially among children.

 

https://www.phonegatealert.org/en/french-ministerial-announcements-an-important-step-in-our-actions-to-protect-the-health-of-mobile-phone-users

 

The Italian court ordered the government (Ministries of the Environment and Education) to launch a campaign to advise the public of the health risks from mobile and cordless phones.  https://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/italian-decision-precaution

 

We want to know why your department is protecting the profits of a billion-dollar industry by allowing the sale of products on the market that exceed the federal guidelines, Safety Code 6 and not the health and well being of our children?

 

Looking forward to your respond to our concerning questions.

 

Respectfully,

Janis Hoffmann

Parents for Safe Schools