Monday, 25 March 2019

How Big Wireless Made Us Think That Cell Phones Are Safe - Part 2

5G In 5 Minutes - Video

Clearing trees for the 5G technology
x

Will 5G Cell Phone Technology Lead To Dramatic Population Reduction As Large Numbers Of Men Become Sterile?
Another concern is the effect on fertility. Females are born with all the eggs they ever will have and, during gestation, they are subject to EMR by cell phones or wireless computers held on laps of mothers. Eggs could suffer irreparable damage realized only later. Even though sperm are produced on an ongoing basis, recent studies show that exposure to EMR can and does cause damage that can lead to reduced infertility. With 5G and the increase of EMR that will be “mandatory”, infertility is likely to increase as it has since the introduction of cell phones.


How Big Wireless Made Us Think That Cell Phones Are Safe: A Special Investigation

Carlo urged the CEOs to do the right thing: give consumers “the information they need to make an informed judgment about how much of this unknown risk they wish to assume,” especially since some in the industry had “repeatedly and falsely claimed that wireless phones are safe for all consumers including children.”


Dr. Martin Pall To The NIH: "The 5G Rollout Is Absolutely Insane."
Dr. Pall confirms that the current 2G/3G/4G radiation the population is exposed to has been scientifically linked with: Lowered fertility, Insomnia, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and major changes in brain structure in animals, Cellular DNA damage, Oxidative stress, Hormonal disruption, Cancer, and much more


Public Waking up to Fact that 5G has not been Proven Safe for Human Health
The beams of microwave radiation will follow a person who is holding a 5G phone or who is moving with one of these phones on his or her body. These beams of radiation have to be strong enough to penetrate walls and human flesh such as hands and heads, because you won’t know the direction from which the microwave beam is coming.


This could be infront of your home
a

Parents denied an opportunity to decide on Cell Phone Ban in BC's classrooms

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Parents denied an opportunity to decide on Cell Phone Ban in BC's classrooms
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 20:08:00 -0700
From: Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
To: educ.minister@gov.bc.ca
CC: premier@gov.bc.ca, hlth.minister@gov.bc.ca



Dear Minister of Education, Rob Fleming,
It was exciting news when the Ontario government allowed the parents to make an informed decision on the banning of cell phones in the classrooms.  It takes leadership to challenge what is popular and address the growing problem of cell phone addiction in our schools.  It’s clear the constant use of cell phones is interfering with our children’s ability to interact and develop healthy relationships in the real world.  This addiction is robbing our children of the opportunity to build life skills that include critical thinking, communication, cooperation, and the ability to focus.

Besides the negative impact this addiction has on learning, parents, teachers and students are aware of the known health risks from the unregulated exposure to microwave radiation emitting from these wireless devices.   This decision will make a huge impact on the reduction of radiation exposure our children are experiencing in our classrooms.

Our Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry has refused to provide us with an official response to the 2018, current findings of the US National Toxicology Program and the supporting Ramazzini Institute Study who concluded there is “Clear Evidence of Carcinogenic Activity” and the association of cancer in the heart and brain and cell phone radiation.

It is a SCIENTIFIC FACT that this exposure causes many health effects, including cancers, anxiety, depression, autism, Alzheimer’s, hormone problems, DNA damage, infertility, etc.  As documented in
over 27,000 peer reviewed studies by scientists and medical experts https://www.emf-portal.org/en

Parents, teachers and students have been told by Dr. Richard Stanwick, School Medical Health Officer that microwave radiation, a known 2b carcinogen listed next to lead, DDT, methyl mercury, chloroform, and car exhaust, is an acceptable risk in our schools, is cancer an acceptable risk too?

You have decided for the parents of BC not to ban the use of Cell Phones in the classrooms and yet your child is benefiting from the ban of cell phones in Central Middle School. Does this sound fair?

Children are still putting these devices to their heads, abdomens and in their pockets when the Safety Manuals state”  To be sure that human exposure to RF energy does not exceed the FCC, IC and European Union guidelines, always follow these instructions and precautions: Orient the device…away from your body… Why is the BC government refusing to educate parents, teachers and students the safe use of these wireless devices?  Yet an Italian court has ordered the government (Ministries of the Environment and Education) to launch a campaign to advise the public of the health risks from mobile and cordless phones.  https://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/italian-decision-precaution

We hope with the overwhelming amount of evidence of harm that you will reconsider your decision and follow the Ontario Government’s lead to ban cell phones the classrooms of BC.

We are hoping for a timely response,

Janis Hoffmann
Parents for Safe Schools

x

Ontario to ban cellphones from classrooms


The Court of Florence has ordered the immediate shutdown of Wi-Fi in a school to protect the health of a minor

US Schools Are Banning Cell Phones In The Classroom
This is a compilation of news from 2016 and 2017

Cell Phones in Schools: To ban or not to ban?

Transition to cellphone-free classrooms smooth: principal

France to impose total ban on mobile phones in schools

This School Banned Cell Phones And Happiness Followed

Secondary schools are introducing strict new bans on mobile phones 

'Cellphone hotels' give Kingston students a break
NSW review may ban smart phones in schools

Parents, teachers welcome ban on cell phones in schools

Proposed legislation looks to tackle phone use in schools

Government outlaws use of cell phones in schools


We want to know, is Cancer an acceptable risk too?

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Janis Hoffmann <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 8:03 AM
Subject: We want to know, is Cancer an acceptable risk too?
To: <premier@gov.bc.ca>, <HLTH.Health@gov.bc.ca>
Cc: <educ.minister@gov.bc.ca>, <bonnie.henry@gov.bc.ca>

Dear John Horgan and Adrian Dix
We are appalled that Dr. Bonnie Henry felt a regurgitated form letter from Kendall’s library of lies and deception was good enough to send to a large group of parents, teachers and students who are concerned about the current proven health risks to our children from the mandatory exposure to microwave radiation exposure in our schools.  Dr. Kendall disregarded and minimized thousands of peer-reviewed studies, providing proof of cancer, DNA damage, protein synthesis, stress response, and detrimental biological and health effects in humans that occur at radiation levels far below the existing Safety Code 6 Guideline.

Dr. Kendall was unable to provide the parents with even ONE peer reviewed study by a scientist or medical expert stating “exposure to microwave radiation is safe for children and the unborn.” The link Dr. Henry provided to Dr. Kendall's information is a dead link.

Dr. Stanwick, our School Health Officer, has endorsed the installation of a known 2b carcinogen listed next to lead, DDT, methyl mercury, chloroform, and car exhaust as an acceptable risk in our schools.  We want to know is Cancer an acceptable risk too?

Dr. Bonnie Henry stated in her recent email that, she along with my colleagues across the country, continue to monitor the science around electromagnetic fields and have reviewed the recent publications with scientists at the BCCDC and the BC Cancer Agency.  We are requesting a copy of these studies and the recent publications that were recently "reviewed" along with the names of the scientists and medical experts who stated microwave radiation exposure is safe.

We want to know how can Dr. Bonnie Henry even consider using the BC Cancer Agency for a reference for Wi-Fi safety in our schools when they clearly they have a vested interest in supporting the wireless industry in return for millions of dollars in donations? Telus, Glentel and BC Hydro are long time supporters of this organization.

This scandalous report shows just how reputable this organization is. CEO, Dr. Max Coppes from The BC Cancer Agency receives $561,000 in salary, while they celebrate volunteers, working for free, to raise money! 

In 2013, almost 6 years ago, the BC Center for Disease Control, cautioned in their 400 page report on RF/EMR that their findings are consistent with many international experts who continue to warn that prolonged exposure to low levels of microwave radio frequency radiation from wireless devices that include wi-fi, ipads, cell phones, cordless phones and smart meters, can lead to serious health effects such as infertility and cancer, children especially at risk. 
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1I6PMTOkSZL-OcdXmU0Q-M35IdU6vAqmn

We are aware Health Canada administers the Radiation Emitting Devices Act which governs the sale, lease, and importation of radiation emitting devices does NOT have any regulations in place to protect the public from long-term exposure to the biological effects of the “non-thermal” levels of microwave radiation.  In 2013, in the Superior Court of Quebec, James McNamee, scientist for Health Canada, admitted that the Safety Code 6 guideline for microwave radiation emitting from wireless technology is based ONLY on thermal effects, heating of the skin.

On page 3, inside the Safety Code 6 document it states, “These guidelines apply to all individuals working at, or visiting, federally regulated sites and may also be adopted by the provinces, industry or other interested parties.” Schools are not federally regulated sites and, therefore, SC 6 does not apply to wifi in schools. The fact that the provinces may Adopt SC 6 means that the provinces are free to set their own guidelines.
http://www.radiationsafety.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Safety-Code-6.pdf
 
Dr. Bonnie Henry states that “. . . and we continue to recommend people make personal choices to reduce their exposure.” How can parents make a Personal Choice to protect their children when microwave radiation exposure is mandatory 6 hours a day 5 days a week in all our public schools and 24/7 in hospitals?

Our Provincial Health Officer, Dr. Bonnie Henry, has failed to provide us with an official response to the 2018, current findings of the US National Toxicology Program and the supporting Ramazzini Institute Study along with over 27,000 peer reviewed studies that confirmed the link to Cancer from Microwave Radiation Exposure.

Canada agreed the Precautionary Principle would be implemented when an activity raises threats of harm to human health or the environment, even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically. The Precautionary Principle shifts the burden of proof, insisting that those responsible for an activity must vouch for its harmlessness and be held responsible if damage occurs. http://sehn.org/wingspread-conference-on-the-precautionary-principle/

Health is a Provincial Jurisdiction. You have an obligation and a duty to protect our children by taking the reasonable steps to reduce wireless radiation in our schools immediately given the overwhelming amount of evidence of harm.

Respectfully,

Janis Hoffmann
Parents for Safe Schools

Wifi and EMF studies (29 pages)



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: FW: Our request for a statement on Wifi safety in our schools
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2019 15:18:34 +0000
From: Health, HLTH HLTH:EX <HLTH.Health@gov.bc.ca>
To: 'iknowjanis@shaw.ca' <iknowjanis@shaw.ca>
CC: OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX <Premier@gov.bc.ca>, Minister, EDUC EDUC:EX <EDUC.Minister@gov.bc.ca>


1120690/1121040

Janis Hoffmann

Dear Janice Hoffmann:

I am responding to a number of emails and letters you have sent in the last few months. I am aware that you have had several responses from my predecessor Dr. Kendall and from staff at the Ministry of Health on this issue. The Honourable Adrian Dix, Minister of Health, asked that I respond on his behalf.

As you are aware Health Canada administers the Radiation Emitting Devices Act which governs the sale, lease, and importation of radiation emitting devices. The agency has a mandate to carry out research into possible human effects, monitor scientific literature, and develop recommended human health exposure guidelines. Health Canada’s Safety Code 6 sets out recommended limits for safe human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF). Safety Code 6 is designed to protect all age groups including children on a continuous basis and considers cumulative exposure to electromagnetic fields.
In British Columbia, the BC Centre for Disease Control (BCCDC) also provides information regarding the human health effects of electro-magnetic exposures. This information can be found at: http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/health-your-environment/electro-magnetic-exposures.  


In my role as Provincial Health Officer I, along with my colleagues across the country, continue to monitor the science around electromagnetic fields and have reviewed the recent publications with scientists at the BCCDC and the BC Cancer Agency. There continues to be more research needed around cellphone use and cancer and we continue to recommend people make personal choices to reduce their exposure. The scientific consensus, however, continues to support there is no evidence that exposure to wifi and smart metres and other devices which use radiofrequency transmission at current exposure levels poses a threat to health of children or adults in BC. The statement above remains the position of my office on this issue.
Sincerely,


Bonnie Henry, MD
MPH, FRCPC
Provincial Health Officer

pc:       Honourable John Horgan, Premier
Honourable Adrian Dix, Minister of Health
          Honourable Rob Fleming, Minister of Education