From: Safetecinschools <citizens4safetec@gmail.com>
Subject: #5 Dear BC Minister of Education, Why would you jeopardize our children’s health and well being by relying on old outdated information from Health Canada and Safety Code 6?
To: <educ.minister@gov.bc.ca>
Dear BC Minister of Education, Jennifer Whiteside,
- Did you know Canada does not have any regulations in place to protect the public from the long-term exposure to the biological effects of the “non-thermal” levels of microwave radiation emitting from wireless technology?
- Did you know that in 2013, James McNamee, scientist for Health Canada, admitted in the Superior Court of Quebec, that the Safety Code 6 guidelines for microwave radiation emitting from wireless technology is based ONLY on thermal effects, heating of the skin?
- Did you know Safety Code 6 was first published in 1979 and was based on the premise that if microwave radiation did not heat, it would not harm living tissue?
- Did you know the safety information for Safety Code 6 is based on a 200-pound (91 kg) mannequin with a cell phone testing only for temperature changes not for any of the biological effects such as DNA damage?
- Did you know there are thousands of peer-reviewed studies by scientists and medical experts proving serious health risks from the prolonged and accumulative exposure to microwave radiation dating as far back as 1970?
- Did you know that Health Canada have willfully dismissed 140 peer reviewed studies in 2015 presented to them from qualified experts, nationally and internationally, which emphasizes the need for "precautionary" measures to reduce exposure and risk from the harmful effects?
- Did you known that Health Canada’s summary of studies consist of 19 studies ranging from 1983 before the World Health Organization declare RF as a 2B carcinogen, in 2011, to 2012, then jumping to 2016?
- Did you know Health Canada had announced their support for a 2016 study by James McNamee, et al., done in 2012, where mice were exposed for 4 hours over 5 days and concluded no evidence of harm, claiming it was the most comprehensive study of its type ever done?
- Did you know Health Canada was unable to provide parents with ONE peer reviewed study by a scientist or medical expert stating, “Exposure to microwave radiation is safe for children and the unborn?”
Our question is: Why would you jeopardize our children’s health and well being by relying on old outdated information from Health Canada and Safety Code 6 when there is a safer alternative to connect to the Internet?
Respectfully,
Janis Hoffmann
Parents for Safe Schools
https://www.appel5gappeal.ca/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Letter #1 http://parentsforasafeschool.
Letter #2 http://parentsforasafeschool.
Letter #3
http://parentsforasafeschool.
Letter #4 http://
No comments:
Post a Comment